IBJNews

Wal-Mart again attempting to build in Zionsville

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has filed new plans to build a store along Michigan Road in Zionsville, six years after the town rebuffed its original proposal that drew the ire of local residents and merchants.

The Bentonville, Ark.-based mega-retailer wants to build a roughly 150,000-square-foot store on about 23 acres along Michigan Road and 106th Street straddling the Boone-Hamilton county line.

Wal-Mart owns the property, which is the same parcel the company attempted to build on in 2006.

Then, Michigan developer Heritage RDG LLC proposed a much larger 300,000-square-foot shopping center anchored by a Walmart Supercenter along Michigan Road north of 106th Street.

Heritage attempted to rezone the property, which the Zionsville Town Council denied. The developer altered the plans to avoid a rezoning, prompting councilors to pass an ordinance limiting the size of a free-standing retail building to 60,000 square feet.

Because Wal-Mart’s current plans call for a store more than twice that size, a variance would be needed, said Wayne DeLong, Zionsville’s director of planning and economic development.

The Zionsville Plan Commission is set to consider the proposal at its Oct. 15 meeting, which should draw plenty of interest from local residents.

“Any project of this size is going to intrigue folks that are near and in proximity to the project,” DeLong said. “I can’t say if there will be more or less interest than before. I would certainly think there would be some interest given the history.”

DeLong is unsure how long it might take for Wal-Mart to receive approval, if a variance is granted.

Meanwhile, approval of Wal-Mart’s proposal could end a long-running dispute between the company and the town that led to two lawsuits.

The latest, filed by Wal-Mart in June 2008, is still pending in Boone Superior Court and charges that the commission had no legal basis to deny the store.

Several residents and merchants voiced their displeasure with the proposed store, charging that it would hurt the charm and small-town feel of the historic village.

But judging from the current plans submitted by Wal-Mart, which depict a brick façade and plenty of landscaping, Julie Johns Cole, executive director of the Zionsville Chamber of Commerce, said her organization might be more receptive to the project.

“Overall, our feelings are very positive,” she said. “The residents would benefit from the commercial investment and from competition on groceries and retail items.”

Joe Calderon, a partner at Indianapolis law firm Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, is representing Wal-Mart. He could not be reached for comment Thursday morning.

Wal-Mart’s nearest store to the proposed site is about two miles south, on 86th Street just east of Michigan Road.

The site would position Wal-Mart near its main rival, SuperTarget, southeast of 106th Street and Michigan Road.
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • THEY LAUGHED AT GREENWOOD
    I was at the Greenwood City Council meeting when Walmart got approval here. I followed them out, they were laughing and snickering. Few of the tree in the promised "heavily treed" parking lot remain. Blight.
  • Walmart will not benefit schools
    The Walmart is in the TIF area. Therefore none, or at most very little of the tax revenues the Town Council promises, will go to the schools until the TIF expires in 2028.
  • Clean up old Walmart ghetto stores first.
    Walmart allows their old stores to deteriorate and degrade. They don't value cleanliness in their old stores or bathrooms. They don't value quality products, because they've cheapened every items down to it's cheap & throw away stature. Aren't our landfilled overflowing & who needs more stuff in their homes?
  • deja vu
    Sounds to me like the public relations people are posting again. Look, the fact is, if that property is given a variance, all the land west (and possibly east) along the border of Michigan road is up for commercial grabs. Then, any residential property near or around there, will be surrounded and encroached on just like Carmel west of Meridian is now. I am sure the Pittman family is ecstatic about this zoning variance, as this gives them the opportunity to ask for the same up to 116th in the future. Then, the commercial property will not be so far away from the center of town, or the park, etc. Oh, and THEN they will need to expand and widen the road to handle the traffic. Deja vu all over again.
  • Progress?
    Jack - I can't stand shopping at Wal-Mart, so my bias causes me to wonder whether bringing Wal-Mart to town is "progress." But you raise a valid point -- A Wal-Mart on 421 shouldn't take away from the village feel of Zionsville. Besides, I doubt those inclined to shop in Zionsville village are the type to shop at Wal-Mart, and vice-versa. As others have noted, Zionsville is missing out on the commercial property tax revenue being collected by Carmel and Whitestown. That alone may force Zionsville to capitulate this time.
  • Small Town?
    They are talking about building the Wal-Mart in the middle of a commercial corridor. How is that going to hurt the small town feel of Zionsville? They're not going to build it on main street. Time for the old guard in Zville to realize that progress is good.
    • Need Grocery Stores!
      Zionsville has a major lack of options for grocery shopping. Currently, you have a serious lack of options for the number of people who live in the area. You have Marsh, or Marsh! They are overpriced! Bring in WalMart, Meijer, or at least a Kroger
    • its the plan
      Wal-marts plan is to have an opportunity to purchase from a wal mart company every 7 miles. The prices are right the goods are chinese like everywhere else, i still would rather go to an independent store. are there any left?
    • Don't miss the chance
      If Zionsville has any brains, they'll welcome Wal Mart into the Michigan Road corridor along with the other businesses that will follow. It is a commercial corridor full of other businesses. The only differences is that those existing businesses send their tax dollars to Carmel. Zionsville missed a similar opportunity on the West side when they let Whitestown annex all of the tax laden Anson area. Don't be fools a third time!
    • Wal-mart knows best
      It's amazing how many anti-business, anti-capitalism people read a business publication. I think Wal-mart is perfectly capable of deciding how many stores they "need" in a 5 mile radium. They wouldn't build if they couldn't make money. Also, in this Obama economy there's a lot of demand for these Wal-Marts...
    • really?
      tell your elected officals NO.if they approve it vote them out.yes,wal-mart wants no competitors.just like,CVS,WALGREEN AND SPEEDWAY!REALLY HOW MANY STORES DO THEY NEED IN FIVE SQUARE MILES?
    • Hope they come to town
      We should want them here....they would likely be the biggest source of tax income in the town. They might not have needed the referendum for the schools if they had been allowed to build 5 years ago. They won't hurt the village in the least...despite what some people keep saying. That Walmart will do no more damage to ZVille than the Target, Kohls, Home Depot and Best Buy on Michigan Rd did.
      • NO to Zionsville Walmart
        One thing you can say about Walmart is that they sure don't get it when a town says "We don't want you here!" Walmarts anywhere rack up a marked increase in fire and police runs. Crime goes up in their immediate area. And the wages they pay will attract nobody from Zionsville. We don't want them here but Walmart persists in thinking they should be in Zionsville. Let the battle begin again.
        • 2 miles away ?
          Why does WalMart insist on another store 2 miles from itself?? Someday is every retail location on earth going to be a WalMart?
        • Local small business
          Another Walmart in a small town will lead to more local local businesses being driven out. Is that progress? I think not.
        • Walmart in CG?
          From what I've heard, the WalMart is trying to get into Bargersville, south of Whiteland Road off of 135. If you're talking about the lot south of Home Depot, it'd be an awfully small Wal Mart (it'd have to be smaller than the Home Depot, and have less parking, to fit onto that site), right across the street from a Super Target.
        • Domino
          They will get their zoning, as there are many PAC's and developers set to benefit from this. It will be a domino effect, exactly like what is happening in Carmel. First WalMart, then owners of land north, will use that as an excuse they should get the same zoning. Doesn't matter there is plenty of vacant commercially zoned property to the west and south. Any bare land in Zionsville is in danger, especially along Michigan road and Zionsville road.
        • Store Closing?
          I wonder if this means that they would close the location at 86th and Michigan Road? South of 86th Street, Michigan Road is already littered with stores that have closed and moved a few blocks north...
        • WalMart in Center Grove
          there not their
        • WalMart in Center Grove
          IBJ - look into details about a new Wal Mart in the Center Grove area. SR 135 south of Smith Valley; next to Home Depot. They are not wanted their either, but they snuck in.

          Post a comment to this story

          COMMENTS POLICY
          We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
           
          You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
           
          Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
           
          No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
           
          We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
           

          Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

          Sponsored by
          ADVERTISEMENT

          facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

          Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
          Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
           
          Subscribe to IBJ
          1. liek the rest of America

          2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

          3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

          4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

          5. whoa!

          ADVERTISEMENT