IBJNews

Wishard to use $8.3M grant to stem substance abuse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A five-year, $8.3 million federal grant will be used by Wishard Health Services to identify and treats people at risk of substance abuse.

The money was awarded to the state of Indiana by the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. The state selected Wishard and the Indiana University School of Medicine to administer the program. The medical school provides the medical staff for Wishard.

Three of Wishard’s community health centers, including its Midtown Community Mental Health Center in Indianapolis, will participate in the early phase of the program.

At every appointment at these centers, all patients will be asked about their alcohol and drug usage confidentially, as part of an early-intervention approach. A version of this approach has been tried since late 2010 at Wishard’s Primary Care Center.

This type of across-the-board screening for alcohol and drug abuse has allowed for earlier interventions when it has been tried by other health care providers, according to a statement from Wishard.

Earlier interventions have been shown to decrease the frequency and severity of patients’ substance abuse. And when more patients get brief rounds of treatment for substance abuse, they have fewer visits to the emergency room and spend fewer days in hospitals, Wishard said.

"Alcohol and substance abuse remain a challenging problem in our society. A key part of prevention and intervention among those with substance-abuse issues, as well as those at risk, is early identification and treatment," said Margie Payne, CEO of Midtown and vice president of mental health operations at Wishard, in a prepared statement. "The earlier a problem is detected, the more effective prevention efforts may be."

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • great investment!
    I have worked at Wishard, lets see if 10 patients are converted to sobriety over 5 years that will be.... 830k per patient. Awesome!
  • Read the article
    The article says the money will be used to identify AND TREAT those at risk of substance abuse. Considering the volume of people that Wishard sees, I believe it will definitely cost that much over 5 years.
  • seriously?
    $8.3 million to ask "are you using drugs or alcohol" at each appointment for 5 years? seems like a high price to pay for an open ended question that most people will lie about anyway...
  • Seriously?
    In this economy? This is what they're doing with our tax dollars? How many people is that going to employ?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT