World Bank chief: U.S. still good place to invest

Scott Olson
December 3, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Washington, D.C.-based World Bank is as foreign to many Hoosiers as the developing countries it strives to help.

But President Robert Zoellick said Indiana, which is among the leading producers of corn and soybeans, has a vested interest in the investments the bank makes in those far-away regions.

“A lot of farm exports go to these countries,” he said. “The more growth they have, the more exports they need.”

Zoellick, president of the World Bank since 2007, was scheduled to discuss those issues and others while addressing the Economic Club of Indiana on Friday at the Indiana Convention Center in downtown Indianapolis.

Previously a U.S. trade rep and deputy secretary of state under former President George W. Bush, he was invited to Indianapolis by Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, who also served in the Bush administration.

The United States is the largest shareholder in the World Bank, which was founded in 1945 following World War II and provides financial assistance to help fight poverty around the world.

The bank’s operating budget has remained flat during the global recession driven by the European debt crisis. The United States is facing its own debt challenges, but Zoellick doubts they’ll reach the same severity.

“The United States is still by far the largest economy in the world,” he said. “I wouldn’t suggest the United States is facing any imminent danger. But on the other hand, these risks build up.”

Many countries, led by China, still view the United States as a good place to invest, said Zoellick, though he cautioned countries may become nervous about the value of their investments if the United States keeps printing money to buy bonds. Dumping too much money into the economy could lead to inflation and a further drop in the value of the dollar.

The World Bank has invested $142 billion in the past few years through loans grants and guarantees to improve education, health, infrastructure and private development.

The bank has 179 shareholders that provide investments to about 120 countries. Much of the attention has shifted to war-torn countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq, and others in sub-Saharan Africa ravaged by AIDS.

But the World Bank’s interests are broad, evidenced by Zoellick’s visit to Russia last week to help bring attention to saving the 3,200 tigers remaining in the wild.

“The issues haven’t gone away,” he said. “They’ve just changed their nature.”

Friday's luncheon was set to run from noon to 1:30 p.m.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.