IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Airport vendors deserve a break

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
IBJ Editorial

Concessionaires at Indianapolis International Airport, where passenger counts have tumbled 10 percent because of a slowdown in air travel, are asking the Airport Authority for relief from a policy that requires them to price their goods at a level consistent with what consumers pay at non-airport retailers. We agree the airport shops need a break.

We understand that allowing airport concessionaires to raise prices would burden consumers, who are also hurt by the economy. But relief from the airport’s so-called street-pricing policy is in order.

Airport retailers do have the advantage of dealing with a captive audience. But that’s where their advantage ends. Hours are long, getting workers and goods to the airport on a regular basis poses logistical problems, and the rent is almost double what retailers pay elsewhere.

The airport seeks to enhance the passenger experience by using locally known retailers who sell high-quality goods. And it wants those goods sold at street prices. Those goals are worthy, but accomplishing all three might not be practical.

The concessionaires and the Airport Authority are working through these issues, and the airport already has offered some relief by suspending through the end of the year a monthly fee retailers have to pay in addition to rent.

We hope the Airport Authority is serious in considering long-term relief as well. For example, retailers could be allowed to charge a certain percentage above street pricing, which would keep prices in check while providing enhanced revenue potential.

Ultimately, retailers at the airport must be given the opportunity to succeed. They don’t have to be there, after all. Elevated retail prices aren’t to be feared as much as empty airport storefronts.

Help an organization in need

Does your office have white copy paper to spare? An old conference room table with matching chairs? Maybe you’re about to replace the refrigerator in your break room. These items and many more, including some not typically found around the office, would mean the world to a local not-for-profit.

All these items are listed in our Holiday Wish List, a two-decade-old IBJ tradition that starts anew this week. The concept is simple. Not-for-profits need basic items they often can’t afford—some of the same items our readers could easily spare if they knew where to direct them.

The Wish List matches givers and recipients, and it will grow steadily between now and its final appearance this season Dec. 21.

Last year, Prevent Blindness Indiana wrote to thank us for two donations it received because of the Wish List. Those donations, a laptop computer and a phone system, allowed the not-for-profit to direct its resources to its primary mission: vision screenings and other programs intended to head off blindness.

Turn to page 33 to find out how you or your organization can participate. Even a small donation can mean a lot.•

__________

To comment on these editorials, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Epic Editorial FAIL
    I usually agree with you guys, but you missed the mark on this one - badly.

    1. Street pricing was a known part of the lease from the get go. Had things gone above plan and vendors earned more profit than predicted, would they be volunteering a clawback? No way. A deal is a deal. If vendors want out of their deal, then let them forfeit their concession and find a new vendor.

    2. If you do want vendor relief, the easiest way to do it is to cut rents - which as you note are double street rates. If the Airport Authority has bills to pay and its own financial challenges, well, so do the people flying in and out of that airport. Why do governments always turn to soaking the public instead of tightening their belt to solve operating budget problems when times are tough?

    3. Most importantly, let's just cut to the heart of the matter. The Airport Authority rents are based on a percentage of revenue, so if prices go up, the Authority gets more revenue. In other words, this would be a tax increase plain and simple. It's a stealth "bailout" proposal for the Airport Authority.

    4. Once given relief from street pricing, vendors will never go back. This institutes a permanent revenue stream and will let them generate windfall profits on their lucrative, long term, monopoly leases when the economy improves.

    5. Street pricing is one relatively unique selling point of Indianapolis. It is mystifying that the business newspaper would advocate a policy that makes the business climate worse - other than for a handful of lucky concessionaires that is. The city already has nosebleed inducing hotel and rental car taxes. Why add to the burden?

    Again, if you want to give vendors relief, I'm fine with that. Give them temporary rent reductions. If the Airport Authority can't figure out how to make it work with their budget, I'd suggest asking Mitch Daniels to take a week of vacation to come over and show them how it is done.

    You guys need to take a mulligan on this one. FAIL.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT