IBJNews

Angie's List shares soar on first-ever quarterly profit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shares of Angie’s List shot up 26 percent, or $3.65 a share, in trading late Thursday morning in reaction to a fourth-quarter profit announced Wednesday and an upbeat outlook for the Web-based publisher of consumer-written service provider reviews.

It was a turning point for the firm, as Angie’s List has confounded critics by plowing hundreds of millions of dollars into marketing over 16 years without ever turning a profit.

Instead, the Indianapolis-based company chose a path that depends on reaching a critical mass of paid members in a rapidly expanding number of cities, now about 200 markets.

That nirvana-like attainment of critical mass occurred in the fourth quarter, when the Indianapolis-based company posted a $2.4 million profit. That compared to a loss of $5.8 million, or 14 cents a share, in the same quarter in 2011. Angie’s List also announced that fourth-quarter revenue rose 68 percent to $46.2 million.

Company executives gave some clues as to how the company hit the milestone during a metrics-laden presentation to analysts late Wednesday. Some analysts had not expected Angie’s List to be profitable until late 2013, given the high cost of acquiring members in new markets. As the service matures its operations in several cities, expenses are expected to drop and margins improve.

Co-founder and Chief Marketing Officer Angie Hicks-Bowman said the company during the fourth quarter increased new-member sales 45 percent and increased marketing spending “only” 10 percent—resulting in a 24-percent reduction in cost per acquisition.

The value of advertising contracts from service providers—plumbers, heating contractors and such—soared 80 percent to $132.7 million.

“We’ve got everything kind of working,” said CEO William Oesterle.

“A 24-percent decline in [cost per acquisition] is obviously pretty tremendous,” Oppenheimer Securities analyst Jason Helfstein told company executives, asking how much of the efficiency improvement is sustainable.

Hicks-Bowman rattled of a list of positive trends. “I anticipate that these wins that we’ve experienced continue into [2013],” she said.

Chief Financial Officer Robert Millard put the outlook for first quarter revenue at $51 million to $52 million. That would be up sharply from first quarter 2012 revenue of $31.1 million.

For all of 2012, Angie’s List lost $52.8 million, or 92 cents a share, compared with a loss of $49 million, or $1.60 per share, the previous year. Revenue soared 73 percent to $155.8 million.

“We made significant investments in our business during the year and achieved meaningful strides in our ability to monetize our membership base,” CEO Oesterle said in a statement Wednesday.

The company is pouring massive amounts of money into television advertising, fueled by $72 million in proceeds from an initial public stock offering in November 2011.

Older markets like Indianapolis tend to generate the most revenue for Angie’s List. Generally, the older the market, the higher the membership fee–roughly $63 a year in Indianapolis versus around $30 a year in a newer market like New York City.

Raymond James analyst Aaron Kessler said in a report Thursday that Angie’s List did “significantly better” than expected as far as reducing costs of acquiring new members and lowering selling expenses. It also looks on track to have a higher base of recurring service provider business.

As a result, Kessler stated, the company is set up well to “rapidly grow revenues, increase investments in products and technology and maintain a solid cash position.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Crickets
    It has been disappointing to see many criticize Angie's List in these postings. Angie's List is a growing Indiana company who has employed many, including people I know personally, and is doing good things for our community. While I don't expect everyone to agree with their business model, the tone of posts has been very disparaging and demeaning. I find it interesting, however, that the naysayers aren't posting this time with the first profit shown. Keep up the good work, Angie's List.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT