IBJNews

Ariad asks court to restore patent-suit win against Lilly

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A  federal appeals court will decide whether Eli Lilly and Co. must pay $65.2 million in damages, plus royalties, over a drug-patent claim from Ariad Pharmaceuticals, according to Bloomberg News.

In 2006, a Boston jury found that two Lilly drugs—osteoporosis drug Evista and the sepsis medicine Xigris—relied on a technique licensed to Ariad, a biotechnology company based in Cambridge, Mass. The jury awarded Ariad $65.2 million and said that Lilly should pay royalties of 2.3 percent of sales of the two drugs.

However, that decision was appealed and last April was nullified by a three-judge panel, which issued a ruling that invalidated parts of Ariad's patent. The panel said that Ariad failed to adequately describe the invention or explain how others could replicate its work.

"The description is clear and concise," John Whelan, an attorney for Ariad, told the federal appeals court on Monday.

Evista generated $1.08 billion in global sales last year for Indianapolis-based Lilly, according to Bloomberg News. The company doesn’t break out sales of Xigris.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
ADVERTISEMENT