IBJNews

Ballard mimics Major Moves infrastructure-improvement plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Mayor Greg Ballard hasn’t settled on exactly how to spend the $425 million expected to result from selling the city’s water and sewer utilities to Citizens Energy Group, but he’s already got a blueprint in mind: the Major Moves initiative.

So far in public, Ballard has emphasized the long-term positive impact he expects the deal to have on utility rates, the $1.5 billion in city debt Citizens would assume, and the opportunity to improve residential streets and sidewalks.

But Ballard also has quietly prioritized another key objective—business attraction and expansion.

“Is it fair to say we want to use this money to address quality of life issues in Indianapolis? Yes,” said Ballard spokesman Robert Vane. “How broadly are we defining quality of life? Are we defining it to include economic development matters? Yes.
 

Ballard Ballard

“Obviously, it all goes together. The better the city is governed and connected, the more amenities, the better the infrastructure and the better the qualities we are able to offer companies … the better shape we are in.”

In June 2006, Gov. Mitch Daniels struck a similar deal with Australia-based Macquarie Group Ltd. and Spain-based Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte S.A. In that transaction, the two foreign companies secured a 75-year lease of the Indiana Toll Road for a $3.8 billion upfront payment to the state.

Since then, Daniels, a Republican, has used the money to underwrite Major Moves, a series of highway improvements across the state. The theory: New roads and better infrastructure can instantly transform rural cornfields into shovel-ready business sites.

Indiana Secretary of Commerce Mitch Roob said Major Moves has had a simple but profound effect on state economic development.

“There’s an old saying that is pretty true,” Roob said. “If you build a road from anywhere to nowhere, all of a sudden nowhere becomes somewhere.”

When a company considers adding operations or moving its headquarters, Roob said, quality infrastructure is at least as important as low tax rates, generous incentives or a qualified work force. But if a location’s infrastructure isn’t up to snuff, businesses quickly focus their attention elsewhere.

“When companies are ready to expand, they’re not going to wait for that road to be built,” Roob said. “If it isn’t there and ready to go, they won’t even consider you.”

Deputy Mayor Michael Huber said Ballard has scheduled a series of public meetings about the Citizens deal because he wants input from the general public—including business leaders—on how to invest its proceeds.

But Huber acknowledged that the mayor’s administration already has identified economic development as one of the top priorities. Ballard doesn’t want to miss out on any business prospects for a lack of ready ground.

“Over the last several years, over multiple mayoral administrations, the city has lost the opportunity to attract companies because, in specific instances, infrastructure was not ready for that company,” Huber said. “What we’ve learned by working with companies that have expanded and relocated to Indianapolis [is that] speed to execution is so critical, and the ability to get these infrastructure projects done and sites shovel-ready is more a factor than the incentive packages cities can offer.”

Baker and Daniels LLP partner Melina Kennedy, who is pursuing the Democratic nomination to run against Ballard in 2011, declined to comment on the Citizens deal, or how its proceeds ought to be spent. Kennedy said she hasn’t been involved with the transaction, but legal ethics prevent her from addressing it because some of her associates have.

Kennedy pledged to prioritize economic development if elected. She pointed to the BioCrossroads life sciences initiative, which she helped launch as part of Mayor Bart Peterson’s administration, as an example of her approach to spurring business growth.

“My entire focus as a candidate for mayor will be bringing aggression and competiveness to the city in job development,” Kennedy said.

Venture capitalist Brian Williams, who also hopes to secure the Democratic nomination for mayor next year, is much more critical of Ballard’s Citizens deal. He’s not opposed to the concept, but Williams worries that the proposed contract’s terms aren’t strong enough to ensure the cleanliness of Indianapolis water in the future.

“If I were mayor, I would have started with the question, ‘What is the quality of water we expect in Indy, coming out of [the] tap, and going down [the] drain? And once we have that standard, what’s the cost we’re willing to pay to meet … and exceed those expectations?”

Williams also doesn’t believe Indianapolis will receive a full $425 million from the deal. He said under his own analysis of the city’s memorandum of understanding with Citizens, the city would get far less.

Daniels has shown how much economic development $3.8 billion generated by a one-time deal can spur. But unlike the toll road lease, which Daniels pursued in a robust economy, the recession is a buyer’s market.

Williams suggested a different deal in a better economy might produce a greater bang for Indy’s economic development buck.

“You have to question, if you’ve got the asset, and it’s a profitable enterprise, is now the right time to sell it? Am I maximizing value?” Williams asked. “And I’d have to say no.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Skyscrapers
    I'd like to see more condos and high rise build up. There are so many parking lots in and around downtown that would be useful for new highrise business and livability. The market square arena lots, Penn Centre are ideas that need to come to fruition. Also, I think they should pursue SODO all over again, more shops, activities, unqiue restaurants and less skywalk can make downtown even more vitale and exciting.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT