IBJNews

Beech Grove-Amtrak settlement will pay for new Main Street

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city of Beech Grove will finally reconstruct its flood-prone Main Street, thanks to a $750,000 settlement with Amtrak.

"It's a critical issue for the future of the city," said Joey Fox, chief of staff for Mayor Terry Dilk, who announced the settlement Friday morning.

Flooding is such a problem on Main Street that business owners have to set out sandbags after an inch of rain, Fox said. That's made attracting new businesses nearly impossible.

"We've got committed small-business owners on Main Street that deserve more than what we have," he said.

The city received a $4.2 million federal transportation grant in 2008 to reconstruct the 13-block corridor, but the project never started because Beech Grove couldn't come up with its 20-percent share of the $5 million cost, Fox said.

Meanwhile, the city in early 2009 discovered that Amtrak had for decades sent its stormwater runoff into the sewer system through an unmetered connection. A court battle ensued, and in September 2010 a Marion County Superior Court judge sided with the city in ordering Amtrak to discontinue the practice. The $750,000 settlement with Amtrak that was reached Thursday is the result of a court-ordered mediation.

The Main Street project will include design elements similar to the city's Emerson Avenue streetscape improvements, built in 2006, Fox said. The Indiana Department of Transportation is expected to let bids in spring, so work may start this summer, he said.

A city of 14,000 in southeast Marion County, Beech Grove was founded in 1906 to serve people working in the 350-acre railyard that today houses CSX and Amtrak.

Reaching a settlement with Amtrak was a top priority for Dilk, who will leave office Dec. 31, Fox said. He lost his re-election bid to Democrat Dennis Buckley after serving for less than a year.

Dilk came to the Beech Grove mayor's office in January to fill out the term of Republican Joe Wright, who left to focus on his business.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT