IBJNews

Bill would add rules for Indiana financial aid

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A bill making its way through Indiana's General Assembly would change the laws governing need-based state financial aid to add more requirements for students.

Indiana's two largest grant programs would see new stipulations for credit hours that a student must successfully complete to remain eligible, The Journal Gazette reported.

Those enrolled in the 21st Century Scholars program would drop down to the Frank O'Bannon grant if they complete fewer than 30 credit hours a year. O'Bannon grant recipients who complete fewer than 24 credit hours a year could lose their scholarship.

A recent survey of 9,000 Indiana college students who are receiving state financial aid found that only half are taking enough courses to graduate in four years.

"We have to do something different to encourage kids to get in and out in four years," Rep. Tom Dermody, R-LaPorte, told The Journal Gazette. "We're focusing on the kids progressing toward a degree."

Dermody is sponsoring the bill, which passed the House 77-18 and is now in the Senate.

Indiana spends about $250 million a year on the O'Bannon and 21st Century Scholars programs. More than 73,000 students are enrolled in the two programs.

The 21st Century scholars program provides full tuition and fees at public universities for students who sign up in middle school and meet certain character requirements. These grants, on average, are worth about $7,600 a year. The O'Bannon grant provides a maximum of about $3,900 a year. Both are need-based programs with income requirements.

The changes would be phased in over multiple years so current college students would not be affected.

The bill also would create incentives for students who do well. The O'Bannon grant would provide an additional $1,400 to students who graduated high school with an honors diploma. For college sophomore, juniors and seniors, the grant would award an extra $1,400 to those who earned at least a 3.0 grade-point average during the previous academic year. Students who completed 39 or more credit hours during the previous academic year also would get an additional $1,300.

Students who get a bachelor's degree in four years would receive a $1,000 bonus, which could rise to $1,500 if they graduate early. The money could go toward moving expenses for a job, a professional wardrobe or to pay down student loans, among other things.

"We hope the students will be able to stay in by changing their behavior," Mary Jane Michalak, associate commissioner of student financial aid, told The Journal Gazette. "That means completing courses. Right now, the state is paying for courses students never complete."

The bill also requires public universities to create a guide for every student that tells them what courses they need to take to graduate in four years. The bill also says universities must provide free courses if a student can't get into a class through no fault of their own.

State financial aid covers only four years' worth of classes.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Financial eligibility for school is a joke in US
    Oops. Sorry, in my ranting I meant to write that you can wait a couple of years out of high school not college in Europe before you decide what to do. And some make it mandatory for civil service or army before college. That makes even more sense, especially with your troubled youths. Anyway, I simply detest our educational system.
  • Financial eligibility for school is a joke in US
    Really do you have to set stipulations on the amount parents make. Its a joke here in the US. Europe has a far better education system. They don't pay a dime for schooling. There system is based on grades. You do well in grade school/ junior high then ur promoted. If not u are sent to a trade school. This means if you can't or don't do well you won't waste your time or the teachers time in class. It sounds harsh but really, if you can't make it in lower grades you probably won't make it in college. And in Europe you still have the option of paying for college if you want to go and royally screwed up your grades somewhere before college. Its a perfect system of promotion through hard work. Also there is no time constraints. You can work or travel a couple of years after college and then decide where or what you want to do. Not like US where you better apply your senior year or end up with no or minimal scholarships when applying after you've already graduated high school. Just think. Waiting and maturing before going to college. Anyway I could go on. We really suck when it comes to college education. Why don't we hire more basketball coaches for millions instead of professors, so we all can bet money on the big ten. I guess its one way of paying for college.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. liek the rest of America

    2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

    3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

    4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

    5. whoa!

    ADVERTISEMENT