IBJNews

Bill would expand powers of campus police officers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Police officers at Indiana colleges and universities could have the same authority as city and county officers under a bill introduced in the General Assembly.

Republican Rep. Randy Truitt of West Lafayette says lawmakers need to remove jurisdictional obstacles that prevent local law enforcement officials from tapping resources available within university police departments.

Indiana law limits police powers for campus officers to their respective schools. That means campus officers can't stop an impaired driver off campus or loan resources such as drug-sniffing dogs to city and county departments without fearing it could jeopardize a case, police officials say.

Purdue University Police Chief John Cox said eliminating those barriers is a matter of common sense.

"I'm a sworn officer, I graduated from the Indiana Law Enforcement Academy," Cox told the Journal & Courier. "If I'm working and going down I-65 and get behind a driver who I suspect is impaired, I need to be able to pull that person over."

Purdue has an agreement with other Tippecanoe County law enforcement agencies that gives its officers arrest and other police powers beyond campus. But Cox said the campus department had to deny a Montgomery County request to borrow the department's narcotics-sniffing dog because if an arrest were made based on what the dog found, it could have harmed the prosecutor's case.

Cox and West Lafayette Police Chief Jason Dombkowski said the ability to share resources is crucial in times of leaner resources.

"We need that cooperation because we do not have the number of police officers that the FBI recommends," Dombkowski said. "We're fortunate to have another 40 officers in the middle of our city."

Truitt's bill is scheduled to get a hearing Tuesday, as is a similar measure filed in the Senate.

"I think this is a really positive thing because it's going to enhance public safety," Truitt said. "It'll get rid of any boundary disputes, jurisdictional disputes — any ambiguity."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Dangerous Idea
    Here's what might happen if this gets passed.
    Smaller towns will eliminate police officers and rely on the university police to cover the neighborhoods around the school.
    That means the college or university will be paying, through student fees for police coverage that the taxpayers are already paying for.
    Imagine North Manchester, Indiana saying hey we can eliminate the third shift police officer and save $30,000 a year. Manchester College will then cover for us. The MC students win the Quiddich championships and celebrations get out of hand but the police are off in town writing up a lost 76 year-old Alzheimers patient. Both important for police presence, but which one gets dropped or delayed? I am sure you can come up with better scenarios, but you get the idea.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The deductible is entirely paid by the POWER account. No one ever has to contribute more than $25/month into the POWER account and it is often less. The only cost not paid out of the POWER account is the ER copay ($8-25) for non-emergent use of the ER. And under HIP 2.0, if a member calls the toll-free, 24 hour nurse line, and the nurse tells them to go to the ER, the copay is waived. It's also waived if the member is admitted to the hospital. Honestly, although it is certainly not "free" - I think Indiana has created a decent plan for the currently uninsured. Also consider that if a member obtains preventive care, she can lower her monthly contribution for the next year. Non-profits may pay up to 75% of the contribution on behalf of the member, and the member's employer may pay up to 50% of the contribution.

  2. I wonder if the governor could multi-task and talk to CMS about helping Indiana get our state based exchange going so Hoosiers don't lose subsidy if the court decision holds. One option I've seen is for states to contract with healthcare.gov. Or maybe Indiana isn't really interested in healthcare insurance coverage for Hoosiers.

  3. So, how much did either of YOU contribute? HGH Thank you Mr. Ozdemir for your investments in this city and your contribution to the arts.

  4. So heres brilliant planning for you...build a $30 M sports complex with tax dollars, yet send all the hotel tax revenue to Carmel and Fishers. Westfield will unlikely never see a payback but the hotel "centers" of Carmel and Fishers will get rich. Lousy strategy Andy Cook!

  5. AlanB, this is how it works...A corporate welfare queen makes a tiny contribution to the arts and gets tons of positive media from outlets like the IBJ. In turn, they are more easily to get their 10s of millions of dollars of corporate welfare (ironically from the same people who are against welfare for humans).

ADVERTISEMENT