Brizzi says letting White testify would've been 'disaster'

Associated Press
October 15, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's former elections chief was difficult to control and not allowed to take the stand at his 2012 voter fraud trial because he was a loose cannon, the attorney who defended him testified Tuesday.

Carl Brizzi explained his defense strategy during a Hamilton County court hearing on ex-Secretary of State Charlie White's petition to have his convictions overturned.

White was sentenced to a year of home detention and was removed from office in February 2012 after a jury convicted him of voter fraud and other felony charges. The case stemmed from his use of his ex-wife's home in Fishers as his voting address in 2010 while serving on the Indianapolis suburb's town council and running for secretary of state.

Prosecutors said White lived in a townhouse outside his council district with his then-fiancee but continued to receive his council salary and vote in his old precinct.

White filed a 79-page petition in March asking the court to vacate the six felony convictions, saying Brizzi presented a "deficient and unreasonable" defense by failing to call any witnesses during the trial. White filed a separate civil lawsuit in July accusing Brizzi of legal malpractice and other professional misconduct.

Brizzi testified Tuesday in a Hamilton County court that he couldn't control White and that a media interview his then-client gave was "a disaster." He cited a rambling statement White made during his sentencing hearing as a prime example.

"It was all I could do to just keep him ... to just maintain composure," Brizzi said.

Brizzi said he didn't prepare White to testify because when he was preparing his second wife, Michelle, she stated that White hadn't lived at his ex-wife's address.

He said Michelle White's testimony would have contradicted that of White's ex-wife if both were both were put on the stand. Allowing Charlie White to testify "would have been a disaster," he said.

When asked why he didn't spend more time interviewing witnesses before the trial, Brizzi said he's only lost one jury trial in his career.

"Judge, my witnesses are always prepared," he said.

White's new attorney, Andrea Ciobanu, argued that Brizzi was erratic and deviated from his planned defense.

White isn't the first person to accuse Brizzi of poor representation. In May, former Hancock County coroner Tamara Vangundy filed a legal malpractice suit against the former Marion County prosecutor.

Vangundy said she paid Brizzi for negligent legal advice on a plea deal in a drunken-driving and official-misconduct case that ended her career as an elected official


  • b..b.b.b.but its different
    Paul don't you get it? Its all about that "intent to remain indefinitely" stuff! Thrasymachus nailed it in Plato's Republic
  • Get lost!
    White needs to get lost! He's a fool & an embarrassment to this whole state! His guilt was easily proven over & over in spite of his lies & of those who chose to lie for him. He had even told many himself of his dishonest actions then cried to them not to tell. Ridiculous! Lock him up & quit letting him waste everybody's time!
  • Are We Better Off?
    Are we, the voters, better off?
  • Correction
    Did it again...I meant MARRIAGE application.
  • Correction
    It should have been "perjury for listing the wrong address on a mortgage application." Has anyone in the state of Indiana ever been prosecuted for that?
  • White Was Railroaded
    What Lugar and Bayh have done voting using an address that is clearly not their residence is a hundred times worse than what White was accused of. White's alleged offense happened once, while Lugar and Bayh did it in multiple elections. In fact, Bayh to this day still votes using a condo in Indianapolis when he lives in the Washington, DC area. But do they get prosecuted? Of course not. They are politically powerful unlike White. The case against White from the beginning was a witch hunt. You only have to look at the additional charges to conclude how far they were willing to go to try to get White. Perjury for listing the wrong address on a mortgage application, theft for accepting payments as a town councilor for work he had done, mortgage fraud? They threw the kitchen sink at him because they were determined to tear him down. The prosecution of White was reprehensible.
    • someone else's fault
      Everyone wants to blame someone else instead of excepting their medicine. Sorry Tamara and Charlie but it is very difficult to believe that you both were totally innocent and that it is all the lawyers fault for your conviction(s).
    • Embarassing
      Watching these two former elected officials thrash about in the mud is embarassing.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ