IBJNews

Changes to state fair unlikely in 2012 legislative session

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana lawmakers look ready to wait at least a year before changing any laws in response to the stage collapse that killed seven at this summer's Indiana State Fair. And that's if they change anything at all.

Rep. Ed DeLaney, D-Indianapolis, has floated the only legislative proposal stemming from the collapse thus far, saying he would like to raise the state's liability cap from $5 million to something closer to $15 million. But Republican leaders have said that would amount to a handout to trial lawyers, not victims.

House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, says it's too early to make any changes without knowing who's to blame for the fatal collapse.

"I think we're going to have a pretty healthy debate about whether the legislature should take a 'ready-aim-fire' approach or a 'fire-ready-aim' approach," Bosma said.

Experts and state officials have suggested a multitude of reasons for the collapse of the grandstand stage Aug. 13 as thousands of fans awaited a concert by country duo Sugarland. Meteorologists have said fair officials should have known that straight-line winds like the gusts that toppled the stage routinely precede major thunderstorms. The brother of a stagehand who died said his brother routinely complained about the stage's integrity before the fatal day.

Gov. Mitch Daniels has called the wind's narrow impact an unforeseeable "fluke."

Families of the dead and injured want answers; as of Friday, 66 tort claims announcing intentions to sue had been filed with the state.

Those answers will be months in the making. Two firms hired to investigate separately the fair's emergency preparations and response and the structural integrity of the stage are not expected to deliver their reports until next spring, possibly as late as April 15, one month after lawmakers have finished their work for the year.

State Fair Executive Director Cindy Hoye told members of the Legislature's fair advisory committee last week that although Witt Associates has finished much of its work assessing the state's emergency preparations, it will wait to release its report until the engineering firm Thornton Tomasetti completes it work closer to April.

"I want to be very careful before we get into changing any laws," said Sen. James Merritt, R-Indianapolis, a 14-year veteran of the legislature's State Fair Advisory Committee. He expects lawmakers to discuss the stage collapse extensively next year but said any proposals probably wouldn't make their way to the governor's desk until 2013.

Bosma concurs.

"The state can't say 'Here's what we should do' until we find out who is to blame and what the damages are," Bosma said.

Hoye, Bosma and others have said they want to wait to see the recommendations before making any major changes to how the fair operates.

DeLaney contends the lack of urgency stems from a desire to stall and try to sweep the issue under the rug. He notes that other venues evacuated audiences long before the storm hit Indianapolis, raising questions about whether the fair should have acted sooner to evacuate concertgoers.

"Those questions don't require any high-tech examination, but those questions are not being faced because there's no upside, there's no good answer," he said.

Rep. Bob Cherry, R-Greenfield, runs the Legislature's committee overseeing state fair operations. The panel had its sole meeting for the year last week.

Cherry falls solidly in the camp of those who believe it's best to wait for the results of the two investigations before making any decisions. But he said the Daniels administration and the state fair could change their emergency operations and evacuation procedures on their own.

Looks like the ball is in the administration's court, at least for another year and a half.


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Govnr Response
    I can't believe the Governor basically said 'stuff happens'. Wow. Very disrespectful to the victims.
  • Yes to Permanent Structure
    It should be a permanent structure otherwise why would an act agree to play there? I was also at the Sugarland concert. It fell too easily to be considered an act of God situation.
  • Were you there?
    I was at the Sugarland Concert, and many others in past years. Yes, there are "Acts pf God" when people die and it can't be prevented. But that isn't the case here. The stage did not have the horizontal braces it needed to keep it from falling forward. Also, the State Fair didn't evacuate when they should have. This was human error, not an act of God.
  • Honor those
    Honor those who died with a permanent structure.
    Please blame the wind. It falls under an Act of God. No different than a tornado. It just wasn't that strong.
    • why not
      why not make the structure a permenant one. Why does it have to be removed. Its used continually for concerts etc. Also move it back farther away from the stands so that ground seating(which is where all the deaths occurred, save 1) would be farther away.I saw KISS last year and wondered why it isn't a fixed structure. Beyond that the people who own and operate the staging are responsible I would think.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. The lack of street-level retail in this part of the Block 400 development is a huge oversight and somewhat perplexing given the high quality of recent city-backed developments downtown. This portion of an otherwise stellar development is going to have an extremely negative impact on the aesthetics, urban environment, walkability, and livability of the NW quad.

        I'm not sure why One America would oppose including retail. And I find it very hard to believe that the thousands of office workers literally footsteps away wouldn't be able to support new lunchtime destinations and other businesses along Illinois and Vermont. We've got to reconnect the disjointed segments of our blossoming downtown, not create yet another lifeless dead zone that no one wants to walk through. Sadly, that is exactly what this massive ugly single-use structure will accomplish.

        Why not follow the precedent set by the proposed garage in Broad Ripple and create an attractive mixed-use structure? Why does the city get it there but not downtown?

      2. Bear mind that DS is just not another lazy, rich kid. He attended Columbia grad school and was in investment banking for 4 or 5 years before joining his dad's company. An annual grant of stock options at market price would be the correct pay-for-performance program then no one could argue with it.

      3. This comes from an executive who gave his wife a Bentley as a wedding present. He is heir to billions of dollars. He should be working for a dollar a year and stock options only. Seems like a conflict of interest, time to bring in a non-relative as CEO. Haven't met him, but have heard his arrogance is legendary.

      4. If the property is improved, property taxes increase - more revenue. If AUL's employment grows, more income taxes - more revenue. If more people move and/or work downtown, it means more demand for goods and services, more employment, more taxes - more revenue, etc., etc. It's not just the city throwing money at big companies. There's much, much more. Yes, the project has private backing, but apparently not enough to make the deal work and therefore they don't have it covered. And while Marsh is a nice anchor, they are no credit tenant like a Kroger or somebody. And if the police department has a major shortfall, they need to reduce the force. This city has way too many policemen.

      5. It's hard to defend billionaires, but David Simon has created a tremendous amount of value for shareholders since joining the company. He is widely regarded as one of the best CEOs in America. The company is growing and making good strategic decisions. And Indy is fortunate to have SPG HQ'd here. Now, does that merit $120 million (about 15 mil over 8 years or so)? Maybe. But this family and David have truly built a business. Should Zuckerberg be worth $20 bil? Who knows. Hopefully David will be supportive of Hoosier charities like his family has.

      ADVERTISEMENT