IBJNews

Collectors snap up Bush Stadium's salvaged seats

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis sports fans and collectors lined up Thursday to buy seats salvaged from Bush Stadium, snapping up more than 300 in the first day of the three-day sale—six times as many as organizer People for Urban Progress had expected for the entire offering.

The not-for-profit plans to use proceeds to refurbish stadium seats for use at IndyGo bus stops, a project the group began in late 2011, said Amy Crook, a PUP spokeswoman.

The seats are being sold "as-is" and don't include a base. The group also is taking orders for refurbished seats with new hardware and a base.

PUP, which focuses on small projects that improve urban quality of life, partnered with Indianapolis Fabrications, RecycleForce and Ecolaborative to salvage 9,000 seats from the former home of the Indianapolis Indians in February 2012.

A local developer is rehabbing the stadium's historic façade as part of a $23 million apartment redevelopment.

Gary Watson, an Indians fan who attended the last game at Bush Stadium and the first at Victory Field, picked up a set of two seats for his son who lives in Dallas but plans to move back to Indianapolis.

Watson spotted a news story about the sale and planned to call his son, an Indians enthusiast, but heard from him first. The seats—red ones numbered 1 and 2—will complement an Indians memorabilia collection including souvenirs from that final game in 1996.

The sale continues from 2 p.m. to 6 p.m. Friday and 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Saturday at Indianapolis Fabrications, 1125 Brookside Ave., Suite G50.

Seats are available as singles for $45, pairs for $80, sets of three for $120 or four for $160.

There should be more than enough "as-is" seats to meet demand from buyers during the remaining days of the sale, said Randy Domeck, whose company, Indianapolis Fabrications, is storing the seats and refurbishing the ones that will wind up at IndyGo stops.

Refurbished seats also are available for sale, from $800 to $975 for a set of two, or between $1,350 and $1,700 for four.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Brickyard...ugg
    its people like you that just can't move on and see this as a positve. Those seats sat rotting and decaying and rusting for years, why weren't you crying foul to the government then about just letting your tax dollars go to waste. This became an abandoned property but they city had many opportunities in the past to sell it to recoup your tax dollars and never did. I bet these orgs coming in and taking the seats actually SAVED you money by not having more tonnage of waste to haul away and destroy; and why destroy it when it can be re-purposed? Take a look at PUPs site. IndyGo is partnering on this and is participating where a bus stop was scheduled for upgrades anyway. Its PUP selling them and companies sponsoring the seats at bus stops. I don't see a downside. If you're complaining about your tax dollars - start pushing for sun-setting of certain taxes when initiated and let the voters decide to extend the use of tax dollars.
  • Brickyard
    What? Brickyard, that is an absurd thought process in my opinion.
  • Accounting?
    Did the taxpayers who owned these seats get anything from PUP when they were removed or is this another giveaway that benefits a pet organization? And is IndyGo paying market rate for these formerly public assets? I think it's great that they didn't end up in a landfill like too much of our history. It's great that they can be repurposed for much-needed transit amenities. And it looks like PUP does some cute work. But the pillaging of taxpayer assets has to stop.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

    2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

    3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

    4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

    5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

    ADVERTISEMENT