IBJNews

Complex accounts made it easy for state to miss $320M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

It's apparently not hard to lose $320 million in Indiana. But how it was lost — and what to do with it — are questions certain to linger following Gov. Mitch Daniels' announcement last week that a programming glitch had deprived the state of the much-needed dough for more than four years.

The discovery that millions in corporate tax collections had been sitting in a holding account — even as the state slashed funding for education and other departments — led Daniels to spin the finding as a moderate bit of good fortune. He even waved a yellow Monopoly card that read "Bank Error in Your Favor" and showed Mr. Monopoly falling backward in shock as a banker thrust $200 through the teller window.

But this "bank error" was for quite a bit more than $200.

Verenda Smith, deputy director of the Washington, D.C.-based Federation of Tax Administrators, says state financial and tax collection operations are complex beasts. It's fairly routine for state bureaucrats to misplace a payment here and there. But Indiana's mistake is unique, she said.

"I have seen any number of programming errors, but that one is eye-catching just for the size of it," said Smith, whose agency represents state tax collectors, like Indiana's Department of Revenue.

House and Senate Democrats say they want an investigation into how the money went missing for so long. They submitted a letter to the state's budget forecasting committee requesting an independent audit of the state's finances.

"We need to have a fresh set of eyes looking at all these issues," said Rep. Scott Pelath, D-Michigan City.

Indiana has safeguards in place to prevent the state from losing money. But those failed to catch the mistake for more than four years.

Budget Director Adam Horst said the State Board of Accounts conducts annual audits of the Department of Revenue but would never have found the programming glitch. A separate internal audit division monitors the revenue department and ultimately caught the mistake, but it can't check every cog and sprocket of the tax machine routinely, he said.

The evolution of the mistake shows a fairly large gap in how the state accounts for its many millions of dollars. At first, during the 2007 budget year, the state only misplaced $5 million, a fairly easy amount to miss when put in context of a $14 billion budget. But by the close of the latest budget year, the state had missed nearly $140 million, or roughly 10 percent of its corporate tax collections. Daniels said by that point he had noticed something seemed to be off, but he couldn't quite nail it down.

"During the difficult times (during the recession), I was puzzled. We were frustrated, of course, because we were wrestling with very difficult decisions as revenues in general were falling," Daniels said. "It did seem from what we were reading that maybe those payments were light."

Even so, the money didn't reappear until a state worker accidentally stumbled on the $320 million in late November while tracking a $25,000 check through the tax collection system.

While the found money is certainly welcome, it rankles those who've seen budgets slashed and watched jobs disappear. Ironically, the board of accounts cut $1 million from its budget last year as part of government-wide cuts Daniels mandated in order to pad the state's savings accounts. The auditing agency also laid off 23 workers in the process, according to a report by WRTV.

It's still unclear what will happen to the money Daniels equated to an early Christmas gift. Lawmakers passed their biennial budget earlier this year under assumptions that the state had significantly less to work with than what was actually available. On top of the $320 million, one-time cash infusion, the state is also expected to gain more than $120 million annually since discovering the mistake.

Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, said that $120 million would be roughly equivalent to approving construction of two new "racinos."

What to do with the money is sure to spark battles. Lawmakers could opt to amend the budget during the 2012 session, but Kenley said it is too soon to know whether they should spend the money — be it on restoring education cuts, paying down the outstanding debt on teachers' pensions or returning the $2 billion borrowed from the federal government to shore up the state's bankrupt unemployment insurance fund.

Of course, the money could also be added to the state's $1.2 billion in the bank, triggering Daniels' much-vaunted automatic tax return. Assuming the state achieves a $1.5 billion balance, each Hoosier would get something truly akin to forgotten money found in an old coat or between sofa cushions: $8.50.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • You're right!
    You're right that there would be fines, penalties and interest if this happened in the private sector. My grandmother died in 1998 and we just recently found an account we didn't know about. We had to reopen the estate to be able to distribute the money. Of course, we had to pay Indiana Inheritance Tax, but the interest we ahd to pay was huge -- much bigger than the tax itself. The onl;y reason we got out of paying a penalty in addition to the tax and interest was because we didn't know about the open account.
  • mistake !!
    If the system is that complex. Get rid of it or find someone to run it. If we in the private sector made this mistake. The government would kill us with fines. Pretty weak Gov.
  • are you sure
    Everyone has to go. The lottery spends 20 grand on equipment and heads roll. The gov's people misplace 320 mill and it is a big joke. The people deserve honor in government, the gov and his people should quit.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT