IBJNews

CNO Financial profits surge 20 percent, beating expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Profits at CNO Financial Group Inc. grew 20 percent in the second quarter and beat the expectations of Wall Street analysts, the company announced Tuesday afternoon.

The Carmel-based life and health insurer, formerly known as Conseco Inc., earned $33.1 million in the three months ended June 30, or 12 cents per diluted share. Excluding losses on investments and debt retirement, the company would have earned 16 cents per share.

On that basis, analysts were expecting 14 cents per share, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

A year ago, CNO earned 15 cents per share, but in the past year it issued new stock, which diluted its earnings by 5 cents per share.

CNO’s revenue dove 13 percent in the quarter to $953.2 million, falling below analysts’ forecasts of $972.4 million.

But sales of new policies rose 5 percent to $95.3 million, with contributions from each of CNO’s three business units: Chicago-based Bankers Life, Carmel-based Washington National and Philadelphia-based Colonial Penn.

"Sales across all three of our segments continued to be strong during the second quarter," CEO Jim Prieur said in a statement.

The financial results were released after the markets closed Tuesday. CNO’s shares ended the day down 6 percent, at a price of $5.30 apiece.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT