IBJNews

Cord Camera to close remaining Indianapolis store

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A camera business that once had more than 30 locations in Ohio and Indiana is closing six of its remaining eight stores in the face of dropping sales and increased use of smartphone cameras.

Just two stores will remain for Columbus-based Cord Camera, both in central Ohio, which had a dozen locations as recently as October.

The Columbus Dispatch reported Wednesday that two other stores will be closed in Columbus, two in Indiana — in Bloomington and Indianapolis — and two in Cincinnati.

The Indianapolis store is in Nora, at 1300 E. 86th St.

Cord had at least seven Indianapolis-area locations in the mid-2000s, with stores downtown, on the west side, in Castleton, Carmel, Greenwood and Fishers.

John Crotty, president and chief financial officer of venture capital firm Colfax Financial, Cord Camera's owner, said camera sales didn't meet expectations at Christmas.

He also said people are increasingly using smartphones to take pictures and aren't printing pictures the way they used to.

Cord was founded in 1954 as Fast Photo Service. It was run by the Cordle family for most of its existence before going into receivership in 2009.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Film
    Also, if you're doing film I believe CVS and Walgreens stopped processing it. Maybe one still does it, not sure? I know one of them does not though.
  • Printing
    Yeah, I would only use those "24hr" services, let alone the instant ones as a last resort. The quality of the paper is awful (mine lasted about 3 years), and the colors are normally off quite a bit. I'd say go to Roberts to get prints, or go to Staples and do it. Staples is great if you want to print a 20X16, etc.
  • Photo Prints
    You can get photos printed at Walgreens (they have a great phone app that can transfer them from your phone to the store), Costco,and Fedex stores all print photos, I'm sure CVS still does as well.
    • Photo prints
      Marie, Any number of places still print pictures and several as Walmart and Sam's Clubs do a great job of taking digital orders on line and having one-hour pick up service at the store. Several drug stores, too, have printing kiosks and give quick turn around. Just because it's a drug store or Walmart don't think you'll get questionable quality. It's good stuff.
    • Oh no!
      I will miss them - is there anyone else in town who prints photos? Not all of us like to keep all our photos stored in a phone.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

      2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

      3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

      4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

      5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

      ADVERTISEMENT