IBJNews

Cultural Trail leaders cancel plans for controversial statue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Central Indiana Community Foundation and Indianapolis Cultural Trail Inc. have pulled the plug on a controversial sculpture depicting a freed slave.

"E Pluribus Unum," proposed by New York artist Fred Wilson, won't be built on the trail, trail founder Brian Payne announced Tuesday. He also is the foundation's CEO.

The decision came after a series of town hall meetings prompted by opposition to Wilson's use of the slave image. Wilson would have used a figure similar to the freed slave depicted on the Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument, placing him alone holding a colorful flag representing the African diaspora.

Originally, the sculpture was slated for East Washington Street in front of the City-County Building, but Payne changed that plan as controversy swirled around the project. Wilson's proposal, part of the trail’s $2 million public art program, drew opposition from local African-Americans.

"Our intention was to be inclusive and commission artists of color, including Fred Wilson," Payne said in a prepared statement. "Regretfully, this proposed work has inflamed a number of long-standing sensitivities within our African-American community.

"We can now move forward together to create a new public art/memorial project for the Cultural Trail for which we can all be proud—which has always been our intent at CICF."

CICF held seven community meetings, one large town hall discussion and created a website around the project. It spent $75,000 on the design and on coordinating public input.

Now the foundation will put $175,000 toward the creation of the new public art project. A group of community advocates who participated in the discussions about "E Pluribus Unum" will be involved as an advisory panel. Members have not yet been named.

A kickoff meeting will be scheduled in early 2012 and promoted through www.indyculturaltrail.org.

Michael Saahir, a member of the group Citizens Against Slave Image, said the new plan "appears to be promising."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Snort!
    The whole concept of a "Cultural Trail" is a waste of taxpayers' money... even if it were 100% funded by donors. It's a waste of valuable vehicular rights-of-way in too many places. For example; Fountain Square. I'm waiting for the first major fatality involving its mere presence. Another waste of major proportions is the Georgia Street Project. Half the driveways can't be accessed via left turns (besides the major thoroughfares being labeled No Left Turn), plus the fact that some of the RIGHT turns can't be negotiated by anything larger than a so-called "Smart Car". There's one place in particular that I'm sorely tempted to address with a Sawzall and/or a jackhammer...
  • Cultural Trail
    Devisiveness is rampant and has been made worse by PC. Too many people looking for reasons to be offended. And a large contributor is dividing Americans into groups.

    We all should celebrate our historical cultures but no one should be an African American or an Asian American. We should be Americans pure and simple.

    Perhaps if we could stop talking about our divisive "communities" and be proud to be Americans, we could all get along better.
  • Scorn??
    "... the scorn of national art critics." My recollection is that some or all of the national art personalities that commented were positive about the piece.
  • We look Like Soliders
    Instead images of freed slaves we should rememember the hundreds of african-american who went out to fight to free their brothers and sisters in the south. It is they who should be remembered.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

ADVERTISEMENT