IBJNews

Daniels outlines fix for national debt in new book

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Massive entitlement spending reform is needed to avert a national economic disaster akin to the fall of the Roman Empire, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels writes in his new book, which comes out Tuesday.

Daniels writes that American leaders will have to increase the eligibility age for Social Security and Medicare and cut benefits for the wealthy. They should also consider replacing the modern welfare system with direct cash subsidies via a "negative income tax," Daniels writes.

The former White House budget director writes in "Keeping the Republic: Saving Americans by Trusting Americans" that both Democrats and Republicans are responsible for building the national debt to monstrous proportions. Although he fills the book mostly with examples of President Barack Obama and Congressional Democrats increasing spending and establishing "shock and awe statism."

When his friends and colleagues were lobbying him last year to write about his personal experiences or his time running the state, he said he wanted to focus on something bigger. Specifically the national debt and unfunded mandates, or the new "Red Menace" as he calls it.

"I said if I was going to write a book, I'd write about what was bothering me about the country and about our national politics," he said Monday in a phone interview from New York City.

The book is not about running for president, he said, which should be obvious from controversial ideas he pushes like ending Social Security for the wealthy and implementing a "negative income tax" which dispatches with the modern welfare system in favor of direct cash subsidies for the poor.

Daniels opted against running for president in May, saying his wife and four girls vetoed a campaign — although he almost slammed the door on the idea with this book.

When he was circulating an outline of his book among friends last year, he intended to open with the statement that he was not running for president.

"The first sentence was 'So many books are written because the author intends to run for the president of the United States. This one is written specifically because I don't,'" he said. "That was going to be the first sentence of the book, but then they talked me out of it."

His goal is to have some of the candidates already in the race adopt his ideas and run with them, he said.

Throughout the book, Daniels likens Social Security to a Ponzi scheme. "If old Carlo (Ponzi) were around today, he'd have made an ideal Social Security commissioner," Daniels writes.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has gotten into trouble nationally for calling the erstwhile "Third Rail" of American politics to a Ponzi scheme, but Republican opposition researchers have also dug up instances of MSNBC host Chris Matthews and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman making the same comparison.

Daniels said Monday that Perry stopped short in explaining himself and should continue on by saying the results of changing the program will not be disastrous and that seniors already guaranteed benefits will receive the same levels.

The national debate has improved some since he began writing the book last fall, he said. The establishment of the Congressional deficit reduction committee gives him hope that more politicians are taking the national debt seriously.

But the spending reductions the committee are considering are still a fraction of what needs to be done to avert a national catastrophe, Daniels said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Huh
    Youo know, for someone NOT running for President, Mitch is certainly making the rounds...
  • Oh really.....
    I wouldn't take much financial advice from Mitch.........his long term portfolio for Indiana isn't the greatest.
  • sick of the blame game
    This country has been going to hell in a handcart for a decade. Democrats and Republicans have both been in some sort of power during that period. Can we please stop playing the blame game? The commonality here is not Democrats, it's not Republicans, it's POLITICIANS.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT