IBJOpinion

DINING: With a bit of pluck, wing chain takes first Indy outpost

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Dining - A&E

You have one question.

That question is: Is the new Buffalo Wings & Rings (111 W. Maryland St., 822-8400) better than BW3?

First, let me say that to me, there are two categories of wings—the edible and the non. The non-edible ones tend to be scrawny and meatless, or, worse, under- or overcooked. The edible ones slide off the bone with just a bit of effort. They hold their sauces and spices well.
 

Dining The downtown newcomer boasts nine different wing styles and five heat levels. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

The wings at the Indy newcomer are safely in the latter category. At Buffalo Wings and Rings, there’s an added bonus that the nine flavor variations are each available in a range of five heats. You can get your Ragin’ Cajun wings medium or atomic. Same with the Teriyaki or the Garlic Parmesan.

Our first visit included a bowl of Crazy Wings ($4.99 for five), which combines the flavoring of the Sweet BBQ and the Roasted Garlic. An unlikely duo, perhaps, but it works. Sweet & Sour, tested at medium, were tame and shy on sauce. And it would have been nice if there weren’t an upcharge of 50 cents for a stalk and a half of celery.

On a second visit (on a 59-cent-per-wing Tuesday), we decided to up the heat, but to no noticeable effect. Both “hot” and “very hot” came across as “pretty mild”—but we did enjoy the thick flavoring on the Lemon Pepper wings.

Supplemental orders were hit and miss. Breaded Onion Rings ($5.99) were big, open Os with just enough breading to cover the veggie but not enough to interfere with the flavor. A Cajun Chicken Tender Sandwich ($8.99) featured two sizable grilled tenders spooning on a bun, with ample trimmings and addictive Saratoga Chips—thin, golden brown potato slices with garlic seasoning—filling out the plate. The meat-resistant diner among us took solace in a Vegetarian Greek Pita ($7.49) that turned a Greek Salad into a satisfying, overstuffed sandwich. A reasonable kids’ platter gets your progeny a burger and curly fries, plus drink, for $4.99.

The atmosphere is bright, and the walls and booths are heavy with television screens (although the volume was mercifully kept low). Servers have clearly been prompted for friendliness, even offering take-out cups for drink remainders.

Back to your question, though: Is Buffalo Wings & Rings better than BW3?

Sorry, but I’m going to dodge that one. On Tuesday, try both. And let us know your preference (this story will be posted at www.ibj.com/arts).

Just make sure to wipe your hands before you type.•

–Lou Harry

__________

Second in our month-long series of reviews of animal-named eateries.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Wings and Rings
    I have been a fan of BWW for years, and have been eating there for Colts games since we got Manning. My 2 friends told me about this new wing place that is better than BWW. When I got there I was shocked to see so many flat screen TVs, they even have one at each booth. Besides all the huge flat screens, the food was outstanding. Dont get me wrong, I LOVE BWW, but Wings and Rings has it going on. The chicken was fresh and juicy and bigger than what Im used too. This will be my place to watch Manning and the boys go for another Super Bowl
  • Not New
    BWR is not totally new to Indy. they have been here before, back in the 90's. One location was at Washington and Post. After the chain pulled out of Indy, an independent owner took over that location. It is now a Gold Exchange "pop-up."
  • BW3
    When I walk in to any BW3 my first impression is the Wal-Mart of sports bars! The tvs and projectors are up to par with what you find on sale @ Frys electronics, I would rather listen to sporting events on the radio. The stools are wooden, why would you not make the seeting comfortable to make sure patrons want to stay for a while and drink ($$)!! The wait staff is looking for their next fix, enouch $$ to score some chronic. The food is typical and predictable! When you look at the capitol to open a BW3 it is a wonder any one is stupid enough to drop that tupe of cheddar on a sports bar that does not compete with Chumleys. I keep wondering when someone will take the time and capitol to open a top notch sports bar? BW3 gets two thumbs down!!
  • All the same
    As long as the beers cold and wings hot. Who cares. More fun downtown for all.
  • Big 10's & BWW
    Just come in this weekend and see the difference. BWW will be standing room only with Badger fans and Big 10 fans.I was in last year it was crazy fun. Nobody can duplicate the vibe and the wings at BWW. Go Badgers!
  • BDubs still Rocks
    Wings and Rings seemed greasy. BDubs still rocks in my book. The beer, all of the TVs, I feel like I'm at Conseco when I'm in there. Also, W&R seemed like an exact copy of BWWs, and the original is always better.
  • Wing Competition?
    B-Dub's still rules.
    BWR's is just another wannabe. The stores look like the B-Dub's of 10 years ago, but not enough TV's or big screens. Wings are the same except B-Dub's sauces far surpass BWR's in flavor and variety.If Houlihan's (a national brand)couldn't make it in that spot. BWR will need lot's of luck.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT