IBJNews

Duke Realty's loss widens despite higher revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Duke Realty Corp. reported higher occupancy and tenant-retention rates in the second quarter, but it still lost more money than it did in the same quarter a year ago.

The Indianapolis-based real estate investment trust on Wednesday reported a second-quarter net loss of $42.3 million on revenue of $383.9 million compared to a loss of $32.4 million on revenue of $348.2 million in the second quarter a year ago.

Duke reported funds from operations, a key measure for REITS, of $40.7 million, or 17 cents per share, compared with $61.5 million, or 29 cents per share, during the same period a year ago.

The company’s overall portfolio occupancy rate rose in the past quarter from 87.5 percent to 87.9 percent, and its tenant retention rate was over 76 percent.

During the quarter, the company made several moves to deleverage its balance sheet, including the repurchase of more than $260 million in bonds. The company issued $250 million in new bonds in April.

Duke also raised $310.8 million in a sale of 26.5 million shares of common stock in June to purchase a joint venture partner’s 50-percent interest in Dugan Realty LLC. Duke now owns all of Dugan.

Dugan owns 106 industrial buildings totaling 20.8 million square feet in the Midwest and Southeast.

“The acquisition of quality industrial assets represents a significant step in our ongoing strategy to reposition our portfolio,” Duke Chairman and CEO Dennis D. Oklak said in a written statement. “We also demonstrated our ability to efficiently raise equity and debt during the quarter, which is a testament to our investors’ confidence in our overall strategy and the progress that we have made to date.”

The company backed its FFO outlook for the year in the range of 95 cents to $1.15 per share.

Shares of Duke were up 26 cents Thursday morning, to $12.25 each.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Every one who has been scammed by these people may be interested to know that we got our money back from them. It took some time and a 'special approach', but it worked. We are now on the way to stopping their activities. Anyone wishing to participate in this action is welcome. Please make contact through our website www.laterelle.com Peter Clutton

  2. Lou, I had mouth watering just by reading your review. I recently was in this restaurant with family and friends and I can tell you THIS IS A REAL TASTE OF MEXICO. Forget about those restaurants that claim being "authentic Mexican food". Don Gusto P.J. has the most Authentic regional taste of Mexican food. My wife is from Mexico City and she can tell this was like home. It's a small place, but the greatness of Don Gusto P.J. is the real authentic taste of Mexican Food and the friendly service. By the way, this is a family owned and operated business. Great review, Lou!

  3. With the way this lovely couple met, it's amazing their business failed. I mean, I'm young and easy going but I wouldn't trust her or him as far as I could throw them

  4. You agreed to make a law to take peoples children out of there home for any little thing I feel like if there is no abuse no violence no neglect no molestation you shouldn't take children from their homes if there not in danger or harm people that do drugs shouldnt loose their kids because they have an addiction they should be helped in wich way they can taking children out of there homes is not the answer nor the solution 90% of time you make the situation worser than what it is do you think that it's fair to the children putting them through this who would even ever come up with this its unfair one of the presidents used marjuana did they take his children or freedom the law is crooked and its alot of dirty people taking advantage of it god isn't unfair to us so we shouldnt be unfair to others something needs to be done about now not later this world is corrupt and the people in it this is a disgrace to man kind I'm going to pray for justice

  5. Getting to perform there again!

ADVERTISEMENT