IBJNews

Duke Realty's loss widens despite higher revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Duke Realty Corp. reported higher occupancy and tenant-retention rates in the second quarter, but it still lost more money than it did in the same quarter a year ago.

The Indianapolis-based real estate investment trust on Wednesday reported a second-quarter net loss of $42.3 million on revenue of $383.9 million compared to a loss of $32.4 million on revenue of $348.2 million in the second quarter a year ago.

Duke reported funds from operations, a key measure for REITS, of $40.7 million, or 17 cents per share, compared with $61.5 million, or 29 cents per share, during the same period a year ago.

The company’s overall portfolio occupancy rate rose in the past quarter from 87.5 percent to 87.9 percent, and its tenant retention rate was over 76 percent.

During the quarter, the company made several moves to deleverage its balance sheet, including the repurchase of more than $260 million in bonds. The company issued $250 million in new bonds in April.

Duke also raised $310.8 million in a sale of 26.5 million shares of common stock in June to purchase a joint venture partner’s 50-percent interest in Dugan Realty LLC. Duke now owns all of Dugan.

Dugan owns 106 industrial buildings totaling 20.8 million square feet in the Midwest and Southeast.

“The acquisition of quality industrial assets represents a significant step in our ongoing strategy to reposition our portfolio,” Duke Chairman and CEO Dennis D. Oklak said in a written statement. “We also demonstrated our ability to efficiently raise equity and debt during the quarter, which is a testament to our investors’ confidence in our overall strategy and the progress that we have made to date.”

The company backed its FFO outlook for the year in the range of 95 cents to $1.15 per share.

Shares of Duke were up 26 cents Thursday morning, to $12.25 each.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

ADVERTISEMENT