IBJOpinion

WEB REVIEW: E-mail sorting service brings sanity to your cluttered inbox

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Jim Cota

This morning, I opened my e-mail account to find 10 e-mails. Until about a week ago, I would have seen about 100.

Credit goes to a workhorse service called SaneBox (www.sanebox.com). But before you can fully understand how it might change your life forever, you need to understand the problem it solves.

For many of us, e-mail is both a blessing and a curse. I truly couldn’t do my job well without it, but all the things that make it so useful (fast, easy, works on my schedule, etc.) also make it easy to get out of hand. For example, on any given day, I get about 500 e-mails. Yes, I have filters created to automatically move certain things into folders. Yes, I have keyboard shortcuts set up to move, mark, delete, etc. But even after all the automatic stuff happens, I still have to manually deal with a few hundred, when only about 100 of them really need some sort of action.

Even a conservative estimate of 10 seconds per e-mail means I’m spending at least a half hour daily processing e-mail that’s essentially unimportant. Five hours a week, almost 300 hours a year. Folks, that’s about 7 weeks’ worth of lost productivity.

So last week, I started using SaneBox, which takes a little getting used to—primarily because you have to do so little for it to be effective. It works with most mail applications, and all you have to provide is your e-mail address and password.

SaneBox then creates folders in your e-mail account—things like SaneLater, SaneNews and SaneRemindMe. It begins to process your InBox to determine which of the mail you have is important (which it leaves in your InBox). Most of it—daily deal messages, newsletters, social media notifications, etc.—gets put into SaneLater. If you get a lot of “news”-related messages, they’ll go into SaneNews.

At this point, you are probably thinking about mistakes. Like you, I’m nervous that I’ll miss a message I really need to see. Spam folders are great, but you have to check them periodically for false positives, so I had similar concerns about SaneBox.

Apparently, the engineers at SaneBox had the same thought. So they integrated a digest into the system that you can configure to arrive as often as once an hour. I started with having it delivered every four hours, but I can tell you it isn’t necessary. When you get the digest, it prompts you to review the messages that have been auto-shunted into the SaneLater mailbox. If you find any false positives, simply move them where they belong. So far, I’ve had to move only a few.

Now, all of this is nice, even though most people could do the same thing by setting up really effective filters. But a few other features put SaneBox on my must-use list. The first two are reminders.

If you see a message that needs your attention but you want to delay it, you can just forward it to 2hours@sanebox.com (or 5minutes@sanebox.com or 10days@…). The message is immediately removed from your InBox and magically reappears at the time you specified.

The RemindMe function takes this feature one step further. Let’s say you’re working on a project with Todd, who occasionally lets things slip between the cracks. Currently, if you forward him something to work on, you have to remember to follow up with him to be sure it was finished. Now, with SaneBox, you can forward the message to Todd and send a copy to 1week@sanebox.com. At the time specified, if you haven’t received a response to Todd’s message, SaneBox will remind you to follow up. You may soon realize you need to fire Todd, but stuff will be getting done.

SaneBox costs about $5 a month, but you can try it free for a week. If you don’t like it (or you cancel your account), SaneBox automatically puts everything back just the way it was. I haven’t found anything else that works as well or as easily as SaneBox to streamline and optimize my e-mail work flow. I can’t recommend it more strongly.•

__________

Cota is creative director of Rare Bird Inc., a full-service advertising agency specializing in the use of new technologies. His column appears monthly. He can be reached at jim@rarebirdinc.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

ADVERTISEMENT