IBJNews

Eiteljorg, Imax seeking approval to sell liquor

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Adult movie-goers to the downtown Imax theater might be able to grab a drink while catching a flick, if the attraction receives approval to expand liquor sales on its premises.

The theater is among several entities—including the neighboring Eiteljorg Museum of American Indians and Western Art—seeking permission from county officials to sell liquor.

Both destinations purchased three-way liquor permits for $1,000 each when 101 of them became available in Marion County at an auction in November.

The offering followed a recalculation—using new U.S. census numbers—of how many permits should be distributed in the city. At the same time, the Indiana Alcohol & Tobacco Commission, which sold the permits, decided to recognize the boundaries of the city of Indianapolis as those areas serviced by the newly consolidated Indianapolis Fire Department.

The Imax, Eiteljorg and some others who purchased the permits are set to have their requests to sell beer, wine and liquor considered by the Marion County Alcoholic Beverage Board on Tuesday morning. The board meets at 9:30 a.m. in Room 260 of the City-County Building.

The Imax, at the Indiana State Museum, now offers beer and wine at special events in which a caterer is used. Having its own liquor permit gives the theater more flexibility to choose what types of alcohol will be served and at what events, said Executive Director Robert Whitt.

“We might do a movie and a martini night, or something like that,” Whitt said. “But we don’t have any plans of having alcohol available for just regular Imax films. It would be more for films that might have an adult demographic.”

The Eiteljorg also hosts special events and fundraisers in which beer and wine are sold. Including liquor would enable the museum on West Washington Street to expand its offerings and cash-bar locations.

The museum’s café on the north end of the building along the Central Canal has served beer and wine during normal hours since opening in a 2005 expansion. It’s typically closed during catered events.

But if the Eiteljorg receives approval to sell liquor, in addition to what the caterer can offer, it would open the café for those special events, museum spokesman Anthony Scott said.

Two local colleges also have purchased liquor permits and are seeking permission to sell alcohol, though one of the school’s requests likely won’t be considered until the Alcoholic Beverage Board’s March meeting.

Ivy Tech Community College wants approval so it can begin hosting its annual April in Paris fundraiser at its downtown campus. The school plans to have that and other events in the old St. Vincent Hospital facility, which it purchased for $1 from the city and finished renovating in January.

The college tore down parts of the old hospital to construct its new classroom building to accommodate a surge in enrollment.

Ivy Tech also bought and renovated the old Stouffer’s Hotel at 2829 N. Meridian St. with a $22.9 million grant from Lilly Endowment Inc. The school plans to move its culinary program into that space and ultimately may open a restaurant there, where alcohol could be served, Ivy Tech spokesman Jeff Fanter said.

Marian University’s request to sell liquor originally was to be considered on Tuesday but now is expected to be heard next month. Its request involves the school’s oversight of the Major Taylor Velodrome and the surrounding Lake Sullivan Sports Complex, which it began managing for the city in April.

The university sold alcohol through a caterer at the facility last fall. Having its own permit, though, would give Marian the ability to offer better prices, said Deb Lawrence, the school’s general counsel and special assistant to the president.

“It’s more cost-effective for us to have our own license rather than do one-day licenses or hire a caterer,” she said.

The requests from the attractions and colleges do not involve carryout sales and are expected to generate little to no opposition from neighborhood groups that normally focus their attention on convenience and drugstore sales.

The latest target of their scrutiny is the Goodlettsville, Tenn.-based Dollar General Corp. discount store chain, which is seeking to sell beer and wine in 32 stores in Marion County.

Fourteen of the permit requests are set to be heard at the Tuesday meeting but likely will be continued until March as well, as the retailer continues to discuss its plans with various neighborhood associations.

Dollar General so far has been unsuccessful in swaying the Marion County Alliance of Neighborhood Associations.

“We are tired of all the alcohol permits given out to everybody and anybody who comes along,” said Norman Pace, the alliance’s Warren Township director. “They hand them out like pieces of candy.”

Nationally, about 3,000 Dollar General stores sell beer. The goal is to stock alcohol in half of the company’s 9,800 outlets, a spokeswoman said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • BK
    Dan G - If you truly believe that Dollar General stores selling alcohol should be a priority to our legislators or even alcohol being sold on Sundays....well, I'm not sure what to say, other than there are much bigger (more important) battles in our backyard. Dollar General selling alcohol will have no effect on an individual's ability to attain alcohol.
  • Hopefully....
    Hopefully our legislators will get a clue and let liquore sales occur on Sunday. What a racket of losers succombing to the lobby of liquore store owners. This is SUCH a backwards state, thanks in part to the legislators. Thank goodnes Mitch has tried to bring them into the 21st century.
  • No to booze
    That's all we need is more liquor outlets to increase the problems of alcoholism in our society. We have gone farther than we need to go in Indianapolis when it comes to the sale of beer, wine and other forms of alcohol. Hopefully, the liquor control boards will be part of the solution and not part of the problem of social drinking in our society. Absolutely NOT to Dollar General's request. We already have too many alcohol beverag outlet in the city now.
    • What?
      Someone cares if Dollar General sells beer? I suggest the neighborhood group find something more useful to do.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

    2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

    3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

    4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

    5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.

    ADVERTISEMENT