IBJNews

Fair Finance offices fail to reopen

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fair Finance Co. failed to reopen its offices as scheduled Monday morning, adding to the anxiety of Ohioans who have purchased about $200 million of the company’s investment certificates.

The headquarters and branch offices of Akron, Ohio-based Fair were closed all of last week in celebration of the Thanksgiving holiday, according to company voice-mail message. That message said offices were to reopen Monday, but callers Monday morning continue to hear the outdated recording. The Akron Beacon Journal said a sign posted at the headquarters said the business was closed due to "unforeseen circumstances."

The future of the business has been uncertain since FBI agents on Nov. 24 executed search warrants and seized records and computer equipment at Fair and at the Indianapolis offices of Tim Durham, co-owner of the business.

The raid came one month after IBJ published an investigative story questioning whether Fair, which purchases customer-finance contracts from retailers and other firms, had the financial wherewithal to repay purchasers of its investment certificates. The company was allowed to sell the certificates—which range from six months to two years—only to Ohio residents.

The IBJ story reported that, since Durham bought Fair Finance from Donald Fair in 2002, he had used it almost like a personal bank to fund a range of business interests, some of them unsuccessful. The story noted that he and related parties owed Fair more than $168 million.

John Tompkins, an attorney for Durham, said this morning that he would have no comment on whether Fair would reopen or on other issues “until we know more about what is going on with the federal investigation.”

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Indianapolis on Nov. 24 filed court papers alleging Durham committed fraud and seeking forfeiture of his property, including his 30,000-square-foot Geist mansion, a home in Los Angeles and his 2008 Bugatti sports car.

The civil forfeiture action alleged Durham, his associates and his companies misled purchasers of investment certificates by telling them their money would go toward purchasing low-risk consumer loans.

In fact, court papers allege, the money went to carry out a Ponzi scheme, using money from new investors to pay what it owed prior investors, thereby “lulling the earlier victims into believing that their money was being [handled] responsibly.”

The government filed the case to ensure “these assets were not dissipated,” Tim Morrison, the U.S. attorney in Indianapolis, told IBJ this morning, but dismissed the case this morning. “Having the appropriate assurance they are not being dissipated, that litigation stopped,” said Morrison, who declined to say who provided that assurance.

Even if Fair Finance had reopened today, investors probably would not have been able to withdraw money. The company has been exercising its right to delay repaying principal on certificates that mature for 60 days. It also has been refusing to allow investors to cash in certificates before they mature.

Prior to 2003, the company had been “liberal in providing early redemptions if the investor had a need for the funds,” according to a letter an attorney for the company sent state regulators that year disclosing that it was changing that policy.

Now, the company takes the position that it is required to redeem certificates early only if the purchaser dies, though it reserves the right to make exceptions for other reasons.

Fair has not been permitted to sell new investment certificates since Nov. 24, when its previous securities registration expired. Fair has sought a new registration, but the Ohio Department of Commerce’s Division of Securities has not acted on that request.





 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What now?
    I have a loan with this company and since all of this has happened they havent been requesting any more payments from me on this account. After the FBI has been involved, I dont want to pay this company another nickel. Their phone number doesnt work and I have received nothing by mail. What do I do? Any thoughts?
  • asset seizure
    Why wouldn't you go after all his assets when he has taken from the average person. How are they to get their money back?
  • dismissed
    Why would you dismiss the case are you nuts?
  • help me
    Oh, my god. I have reinvested for years and felt so...comfortable with the company. Now I have just about everything invested with them. What am I going to do now as a senior citizen?
  • ?
    I want my money back! He better be able to pay back the Ohio investors. Sell his damn sports car and house!
  • Not exactly
    Morrision just filed a motion to stop the asset seizure, the judge has not ruled on it.

    Ohio is not approving any more offerings, nore are they obligated to. Durham did offerings of $1.5 BILLION since 2001--Fair Finance did about $28M last year in revenues with a loss of $1.8M--and Durham raised almost 10 times that in certificates. He's had his chance, now it's time for him to pay all the money back.

    He can prove everyone wrong by simply paying the "loans" back immediately, and Morrison is giving him the opportunity to do so.
    • dismissed
      DID I JUST READ THAT PART OF THIS CASE HAS BEEN DIMISSED???

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

      2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

      3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

      4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

      5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

      ADVERTISEMENT