IBJNews

Fair Finance offices fail to reopen

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Fair Finance Co. failed to reopen its offices as scheduled Monday morning, adding to the anxiety of Ohioans who have purchased about $200 million of the company’s investment certificates.

The headquarters and branch offices of Akron, Ohio-based Fair were closed all of last week in celebration of the Thanksgiving holiday, according to company voice-mail message. That message said offices were to reopen Monday, but callers Monday morning continue to hear the outdated recording. The Akron Beacon Journal said a sign posted at the headquarters said the business was closed due to "unforeseen circumstances."

The future of the business has been uncertain since FBI agents on Nov. 24 executed search warrants and seized records and computer equipment at Fair and at the Indianapolis offices of Tim Durham, co-owner of the business.

The raid came one month after IBJ published an investigative story questioning whether Fair, which purchases customer-finance contracts from retailers and other firms, had the financial wherewithal to repay purchasers of its investment certificates. The company was allowed to sell the certificates—which range from six months to two years—only to Ohio residents.

The IBJ story reported that, since Durham bought Fair Finance from Donald Fair in 2002, he had used it almost like a personal bank to fund a range of business interests, some of them unsuccessful. The story noted that he and related parties owed Fair more than $168 million.

John Tompkins, an attorney for Durham, said this morning that he would have no comment on whether Fair would reopen or on other issues “until we know more about what is going on with the federal investigation.”

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Indianapolis on Nov. 24 filed court papers alleging Durham committed fraud and seeking forfeiture of his property, including his 30,000-square-foot Geist mansion, a home in Los Angeles and his 2008 Bugatti sports car.

The civil forfeiture action alleged Durham, his associates and his companies misled purchasers of investment certificates by telling them their money would go toward purchasing low-risk consumer loans.

In fact, court papers allege, the money went to carry out a Ponzi scheme, using money from new investors to pay what it owed prior investors, thereby “lulling the earlier victims into believing that their money was being [handled] responsibly.”

The government filed the case to ensure “these assets were not dissipated,” Tim Morrison, the U.S. attorney in Indianapolis, told IBJ this morning, but dismissed the case this morning. “Having the appropriate assurance they are not being dissipated, that litigation stopped,” said Morrison, who declined to say who provided that assurance.

Even if Fair Finance had reopened today, investors probably would not have been able to withdraw money. The company has been exercising its right to delay repaying principal on certificates that mature for 60 days. It also has been refusing to allow investors to cash in certificates before they mature.

Prior to 2003, the company had been “liberal in providing early redemptions if the investor had a need for the funds,” according to a letter an attorney for the company sent state regulators that year disclosing that it was changing that policy.

Now, the company takes the position that it is required to redeem certificates early only if the purchaser dies, though it reserves the right to make exceptions for other reasons.

Fair has not been permitted to sell new investment certificates since Nov. 24, when its previous securities registration expired. Fair has sought a new registration, but the Ohio Department of Commerce’s Division of Securities has not acted on that request.





 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What now?
    I have a loan with this company and since all of this has happened they havent been requesting any more payments from me on this account. After the FBI has been involved, I dont want to pay this company another nickel. Their phone number doesnt work and I have received nothing by mail. What do I do? Any thoughts?
  • asset seizure
    Why wouldn't you go after all his assets when he has taken from the average person. How are they to get their money back?
  • dismissed
    Why would you dismiss the case are you nuts?
  • help me
    Oh, my god. I have reinvested for years and felt so...comfortable with the company. Now I have just about everything invested with them. What am I going to do now as a senior citizen?
  • ?
    I want my money back! He better be able to pay back the Ohio investors. Sell his damn sports car and house!
  • Not exactly
    Morrision just filed a motion to stop the asset seizure, the judge has not ruled on it.

    Ohio is not approving any more offerings, nore are they obligated to. Durham did offerings of $1.5 BILLION since 2001--Fair Finance did about $28M last year in revenues with a loss of $1.8M--and Durham raised almost 10 times that in certificates. He's had his chance, now it's time for him to pay all the money back.

    He can prove everyone wrong by simply paying the "loans" back immediately, and Morrison is giving him the opportunity to do so.
    • dismissed
      DID I JUST READ THAT PART OF THIS CASE HAS BEEN DIMISSED???

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

      2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

      3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

      4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

      5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

      ADVERTISEMENT