IBJOpinion

FEIGENBAUM: Right-to-work issue still alive and kicking

Ed Feigenbaum
March 26, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

After largely leaving legislative events in Indiana to Hoosiers to debate and defuse, the passage of time—and the apparent end to arguably analogous circumstances in Wisconsin—seems to have resulted in national political parties and policy interest groups’ turning their attention to a new Midwestern battleground.

This new notoriety, directed at assorted audiences for seemingly different purposes, is not aimed at resolving the impasse more quickly, and could further complicate and even inflame the proceedings.

The first wave of this campaign appeared as the Senate Committee on Appropriations opened budget hearings, even without a formal budget bill.

The committee chairman, Sen. Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, a veteran of the budget process, knew that neither the Senate nor the General Assembly as a body could wait much longer on developing a budget bill. While House Democrats would be judged irresponsible for not returning to vote on a budget before the end of April, Republicans would be equally culpable if they failed to ready a relatively reasonable budget bill for an eventual vote.

So Kenley opened budget hearings March 21 with testimony from the Republican and Democratic leaders of the House Committee on Ways and Means about the budget bill that has been languishing on the House calendar for a month. The high-level discussion was fiscal- and policy-oriented, devoid of politics, and even included praise from Rep. Bill Crawford, D-Indianapolis, for Kenley’s opening the budget to extensive public testimony, something that wasn’t able to occur on the House side, given how late the proposed budget bill came together there.

Kenley also hopes his budget-process openness helps bring Democrats back.

His hearings include a long look at education policy and finance, both K-12 and higher education; Medicaid; and prisons—given how their combined needs effectively control the bulk of the budget. He also blocks out time to address controversial aspects of the House Republican plan, such as redirecting some horse-racing subsidy cash from the ag-equine industry to high-tech economic development and General Fund needs.

No final Appropriations Committee budget vote is expected before at least April 7, but that still leaves plenty of time for the full Senate to have a shot at it, and for leaders to decide what, if any, bills hurt by the House Democratic walkout should be wrapped up in the budget or with other measures.

Keep your eye particularly on charter-school and voucher bills for potential inclusion in the budget. There may even be a quiet push to resurrect parts of the energy-related legislation that surprisingly failed earlier in the Senate.

This could prove problematic.

Sports commentators pontificated at length after Butler University’s last-second NCAA tournament win over the University of Pittsburgh Panthers about whether the standard for a foul at the end of a close tournament game was—or should be—the same as a foul in the opening minutes of the contest.

Such decisions are an art, not a science, and legislative observers wonder whether this session’s unique nature may convince Senate leaders to be a bit more flexible in ruling on germaneness. But as the budget bill is shaped in committee, it comes against a mixed message of intervention by national groups.

The National Right to Work Committee weighs in with a $100,000 statewide multimedia campaign. The direct mail, telephone campaign and statewide newspaper ads (and potential broadcast spots) aren’t pursuing Democrats and organized labor for blocking a right-to-work bill, but rather seek to place the spotlight—and pressure—on House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, and Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels for readily acceding to Democratic demands.

This comes even as the governor continues to contemplate a presidential race amid questions about preferring to take divisive issues such as right to work off the agenda for now.

NRTWC President Mark Mix contends his group’s objective is to apply public pressure on GOP officials to “show some backbone,” and on Democrats to return to work and vote on a right-to-work bill. “If Speaker Bosma and Gov. Daniels continue their policy of appeasement, they will be as much to blame as the Democrats for killing right to work by their refusal to stand up and fight,” Mix added.

Democrats point to this campaign as evidence that right to work isn’t truly dead.

As the NRTWC effort gears up, the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee also weighs in. A new TV spot slams Daniels and legislative Republicans for seeking “to kill collective bargaining, slash wages for workers, and decimate public schools by sending our tax dollars to private schools.” The DLCC spot thanks Democrats for bucking this “anti-middle-class agenda.”

Regardless of where you place blame, local visibility has been ratcheted up as the national implications have been elevated. This fails to portend an early resolution to the lengthy walkout.•

__________

Feigenbaum publishes Indiana Legislative Insight. His column appears weekly while the Indiana General Assembly is in session. He can be reached at edf@ingrouponline.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT