IBJNews

Financial review questions some spending at Carmel arts center

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Center for the Performing Arts in Carmel expects to lose about $400,000 from hosting a taping of the PBS program “The Sinatra Legacy.”

The television show was recorded last March. It's one of the activities the board of directors reviewed after former CEO Steven Libman resigned last summer.

The review—which was made available to the public, along with an annual audit, on Tuesday morning—appears to confirm the allegation that an employee Libman was dating went with him on business trips at the center’s expense.

Libman cited personal reasons when he resigned after signing a five-year contract extension. It was later revealed that a private investigator, hired by Mayor Jim Brainard, had uncovered Libman’s interoffice relationship.

The review has been complete for several months, but interim CEO Frank Basile held off on its release pending an annual audit. The hang-up on the audit was a disagreement with accountants Blue & Co. over the valuation of the center’s 50-year, rent-free lease from the Carmel Redevelopment Authority. The accountants believed that should be listed as an asset, but Basile said the board of directors thinks otherwise.

Since Libman’s resignation, the center has set up a number of controls on spending and approving contracts. The review also said there’s a new personnel policy that deals with employees’ romantic relationships.

The review found that the center committed to spending about $700,000 on the PBS special without seeking board approval. “It now appears this project will result in a net loss to the center of about $400,000,” according to the review, signed by board Chairman Rollin Dick.

The center now requires employees to submit expenses for reimbursement, and the CEO’s expenses must be approved by the board treasurer.

The review found that one employee “did not routinely prepare her own expense report to support her own airfare or hotel charges that were billed on her Center-sponsored credit card.”

The review found that the unnamed employee accompanied the CEO on trips to New York in October and December of 2010 and January and March of 2011, spending $1,193.60 on airfare.

Basile said he could not name the employee because of confidentiality agreements signed with Libman and others.

The review also found that contracts with performers were negotiated by one person and did not come with any documentation to justify the expense, or forecast revenue. Basile has since set up a new process for negotiating and finalizing artist contracts.

The audit shows that when not counting donations that will be paid at a future date, the center ended the 2011 fiscal year about $437,000 in the red.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Get Facts Right
    You forgot to count the $2.3M that taxpayers gave them to cover expenses. If you include that they lost $2.7M for the year ending June 31, 2011.
  • Question
    I do not live in Carmel, but certainly DO want the Centre to succeed. I do wonder, though, about a loss of $400,000 due to a PBS special that was mainly a showcase for the Artistic Director - Michael Feinstein. The audit doesn't seem to address this relationship, so I wonder if I am the only one who finds this curious.
  • question

    The audit (linked off of http://www.thecenterfortheperformingarts.org at
    http://c3105115.r15.cf2.rackcdn.com/2011%20CFPA%20Audit.pdf) doesn't seem to include any costs for setting aside funds for future building upkeep.

    Is the center management not responsible for upkeep of the building going forward or is that a future liability for the city (in addition to the operating subsidy they are already paying out which is listed in the audit data)?
  • can you read?
    well, if you would have read it thouroughly, you would have noticed that was 4 (four) trips to NY. October and December 2010 and January and March 2011.
  • can you read?
    well, if you would have read it thouroughly, you would have noticed that was 4 (four) trips to NY. October and December 2010 and January and March 2011.
  • What the ???
    Hmmm, $1200 on airfare for a trip to New York. What were they flying on, the Concorde?

    I can't understand why that would raise any eyebrows?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

    2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

    3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

    4. Send them back NOW.

    5. deport now

    ADVERTISEMENT