IBJNews

Fixes to historic preservation tax credits may have to wait

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fixes to the state's historic preservation tax credit program pushed by Indiana Landmarks may have to wait another year after the Indiana Senate put the brakes on a bill that won unanimous support in the Indiana House.

The historic preservation program awards tax credits worth up to 20 percent of the total cost of renovating previously vacant income-producing property on the Indiana Register of Historic Places, but it caps the credits to a total of $450,000 per year statewide ($100,000 per project).

Since the cap is so low, the state has been allocating credits for future years, meaning developers fixing up historic buildings this year will have to wait a decade or more to see the tax benefit.

The House bill by Rep. Ed Clere, R-New Albany, would increase the state funding for the program to $2 million annually, setting aside $450,000 per year to catch up on the backlog. It would set aside 25 percent of the credits for projects under $500,000.

But a Senate version pushed by Sen. Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, would prohibit the assignment of credits to future years, making the program essentially unusable for at least a decade. The Senate version instead creates a new local preservation tax credit that could help cities and counties boost historic preservation.

The drastic differences between the bills, now in conference committee, suggest the legislation may die, Tina Connor, executive vice president at Indiana Landmarks, wrote in an email.

"If so, we'll be back again next year to lobby for the kind of fix for the broken credit that the (House bill) provides," Connor said.

Kenley, who could not be reached Tuesday morning, told The Statehouse File that the General Assembly shouldn't make any decisions about state funding until next year, when lawmakers will write the next two-year state budget.

Kenley does not like how the state's Department of Natural Resources has administered the state's program, which together with a similar federal credit can allow developers to recoup up to 40 percent of rehabilitation costs as tax credits.

The House may wind up accepting the Senate version in some form, since allowing municipalities to offer their own historic preservation tax credits is a popular idea. Supporters of the fixes to the state program figure they could try again next year for more money for that program.

The extended backlog for the state program has become a disincentive for developers who otherwise might take advantage and invest more in historic properties, said Mark Dollase, vice president of preservation services for Indiana Landmarks.

A few large projects can quickly soak up most of the credits for the year, leaving smaller projects to wait up to 14 years. The preservation group had lobbied legislators to raise the annual cap to $10 million; the House voted 98-0 for $2 million.

"Our argument all along has been this is a job-creation program," said Dollase, who cited a study the group commissioned that found that every $1 the state spends on the credit results in $3 of private-sector investment.

The Statehouse File contributed to this story.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Mystified
    This is a great bill and it would bring so much to preserve buildings and bring job opportunities to Hoosier cities and towns. I am mystified, to say the least, as to why the Senate would nix this outstanding legislation by one of Indiana's most promising and intuitive legislators.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT