Fox News hires former Indiana Senator Evan Bayh

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fox News Channel has hired former Democratic Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh as an on-air contributor.

The network announced Tuesday it had hired Bayh to offer commentary and analysis across Fox News' programming ahead of the 2012 elections.

Bayh left office in January after representing Indiana for two terms in the Senate. Bayh was considered a moderate within the Democratic Party and regularly appeared on Fox News as a senator.

Since leaving politics, Bayh has also signed on as a partner at a law firm and was appointed a senior adviser to private equity firm Apollo Global Management.


  • Evan Bayh on Fox News
    I don't think Bayh will be ridiculed on Fox News. He gets a pass for quitting his cushy Senate gig because he was fed up with Obamarama. He will be the voice of reason on Fox News.
  • no real news
    Only in Indiana woud someone like Bayh be considered a democrat or liberal. He fits perfectly on Fox. I mean he is not one of those crazy Republicans preaching creationism or denying science, but he is a conservative. He's alway been. And he also has no opinion. So, he could would on any cable channel for that matter.
  • really?
    All i was saying was that if you want your news and you have a choice of what to watch every night people are choosing Fox news.

    I'll switch back and forth from Fox and MSNBC and Fox will be reporting on a world news story while MSNBC is running some comedy satire news program making fun of a republican. They don't report actual news. You may hate the O'reily factor with leberal beliefs but overall Fox produces a much balanced program which actually educates viewers, something liberals desperately need.
  • senator bayh
    This is why he has chosen to leave the political scene....most of the people he had to deal with thought like most of these posters! He saw the democrat party has changed so much over the years, it doesn't even look like the same party he signed on to!
  • propaganda
    Stop calling it Fox News. What they do isn't "news". It's propaganda.

    information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc.
  • Putting the CON in Conservative
    "If Fox News is so unfair and unbalanced how is it the highest rated news station. Try watching MSNBC if you want unbalanced."

    REALLY??? You base ratings on accuracy? If so then Jersey Shore and Real Housewives of [fill in the blank] outscore the ratings of any cable news broadcast.

    Bayh is taking a check. He will be the "liberal" expert on a panel with 4 conservatives. They all shout him down, he smiles and agrees and says ONE truth. Then to cash the paycheck.
  • really?
    If Fox News is so unfair and unbalanced how is it the highest rated news station. Try watching MSNBC if you want unbalanced.
  • He Ain't No Birch!
    I really liked both Bayhs but you wouldn't see his daddy on a Republican station. He's either going there to be made a fool of - or - he's changed his political stance and that's why he got out of politics. Really, I think it's because it was planned for him to run for president in 2008, when that didn't happen, he decided to quit and do something else, since the window of opportunity is closing. But Fox News!!! C'mon Man!
  • evan bayh
    You know, I normally do not vote democratic, however, I did vote for Bayh every time he ran. Glad to see he will be on my television set on a regular basis.
  • Traitor
    Unless he's going on there to be a glutton for punishment, the only thing that has driven this decision is money. This is FauxNews way of trying to look "fair and balanced" but you know he's going to be beat up on the air by the wingnuts.
    • No! Say it ain't true!
      Of all the TV venues, how can Bayh join this right wing station? How?!!

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.