IBJNews

Franklin calls off deal to land brewery plant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Franklin Redevelopment Commission has canceled a deal in which it would have financed the $2.3 million purchase of a vacant industrial building to attract a California-based beer company that planned to hire 150 workers over the next three years.

The commission decided Thursday to call off the deal because TailGate Beer of San Diego failed to respond to a deadline to provide detailed financial information.

In April, the Indiana Economic Development Corp. offered TailGate Beer up to $1.85 million in performance-based tax credits and $100,000 in training grants based on the company's plan to create as many as 150 jobs over the next three years in a multi-million-dollar production, packaging and distribution facility.

"[The commission] started asking for updated information way back in April," said Craig Wells, executive director of Franklin Development Corp., the economic development entity that would have purchased the 48,000 square-foot-building at 1800 Musicland Drive.

"I think there were some red flags based on some information he had provided at the April meeting," Wells said of TailGate owner Wesley Keegan. "The original vote was contingent on receiving satisfactory financial information."

Although Keegan later indicated he didn't intend to provide any further information, Wells said the development corporation held up its end of the bargain by reaching a purchase agreement with Coyote Development. Wells said the development corporation won't lose any money by letting the purchase agreement expire. 

Coyote Development built the manufacturing space in 2008 for Klaisler Manufacturing Corp of Franklin. Both companies are owned by Terry Hubbard. Wells said Klaisler never occupied the building because of the recession.

Other incentives that had been on the table for TailGate included $900,000 in lease guarantees, a $300,000 loan and a $200,000 grant for "greening" the building and operations, Wells said.

Mayor Fred Paris said he’s still in favor of having the Franklin Development Corp. buy the building on the chance of attracting a different company. “This is a phenomenal building in a great location. A lot of times requests we get are looking for buildings like this,” he said.

Paris noted that it took six months to negotiate the purchase agreement because, as a short sale, it had to be approved by the bank and the Small Business Administration. If the building slips into foreclosure, Paris said, it would be nearly impossible to make it available to a new company in a timely way.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT