IBJNews

Future of Big Ten tourneys in city unclear after 2012

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

When the Big Ten men’s basketball tournament tips off at Conseco Fieldhouse on Thursday afternoon, Indianapolis still is guaranteed to host the games the next two years.

But it remains uncertain whether the suburban Chicago-based athletic conference will keep the men’s and women’s tournaments in the city after 2012.

The Big Ten is planning to put the tournaments up for bid and have additional cities compete against Indianapolis for the right to host the games.

The Indiana Sports Corp., which led the charge to attract both tournaments to Indianapolis annually starting in 2008, is unsure when the bid process will begin.

“We don’t know the timing on that,” ISC spokesman John Dedman said. “We know that we have it through 2012, but we have not really looked beyond that.”

Big Ten spokesman Scott Chipman also said he is unclear about the timing of the bid process. He referred questions regarding whether the conference is satisfied with Indianapolis as the host city to Big Ten Commissioner James Delany. Delany could not be reached for comment Thursday morning.

What is certain, however, is that ticket sales will play a critical role in whether the tournaments stays in Indianapolis beyond 2012.

Rebounding from last year’s disappointing attendance could provide a lift. A poor economy helped to dampen demand, as attendance for the five sessions fell to 68,098, down from 80,012 in 2008.

Even a strong championship run through tournament by the Purdue Boilermakers wasn’t enough to offset an early exit by the Indiana Hoosiers.

Dedman at the Sports Corp. said demand for tickets typically is higher when both teams advance far into the tournament. Conversely, though, downtown hotels and restaurants benefit more when out-of-town visitors stay longer.

The Boilermakers enter the tournament this year as regular-season conference co-champions along with the Michigan State Spartans and Ohio State Buckeyes. Purdue is ranked No. 6 in the country. The Hoosiers finished next to last in the conference.  

Despite the Hoosiers’ on-court ineptitude, this year’s men’s tournament should be better attended. Dedman said ticket sales have surpassed last year’s numbers, although he couldn’t provide an exact count.

Strong attendance typically translates well for downtown hoteliers and restaurateurs. The Indianapolis Convention and Visitors Association estimates the men’s tournament generates about $8 million in direct visitor spending. Combined with the women’s Big Ten Tournament games, the figure grows to $10 million.

ICVA President Don Welsh said he'd love to keep the tournaments in Indianapolis.

“The Big Ten tournaments are important to our overall tourism industry, not just for the hotel rooms and restaurants they fill, but for the significant exposure they garner for our city to a regional audience,” he said via e-mail. “Our goal is that Indianapolis continues to be the home for the Big Ten tournaments for years to come.”

Indianapolis began hosting both tournaments annually in 2008, but the city’s relationship with the Big Ten begins well before that.  

With the exception of one year, the women’s tournament has been in Indianapolis since 1994 and in Conseco Fieldhouse since 1999. The men’s tournament, which began in 1998, was played in Chicago’s United Center through 2001, then alternated between Chicago and Indianapolis from 2002 to 2007.

In 2002, the first year the men’s tournament was in Indianapolis, attendance totaled 94,402. It’s never been that high since. Attendance declined to 77,012 in 2004, before rebounding to 90,763 in 2006.

Whatever the turnstiles read this year, tournament backers hope the Big Ten will take into account the city’s experience hosting the games when it comes time to choose a city.

The tournaments help to transform the city into a basketball bastion, particularly when NCAA tournament games are played here in subsequent weeks. The men’s Final Four will be in Indianapolis April 3-5.

“We’re trying to host the best event that we can, both men’s and women’s,” Dedman said. “That’s the best advantage that we have.”

The men’s tournament on Thursday tips off at 2:30 p.m. with a matchup between the Iowa Hawkeyes and Michigan Wolverines. The Hoosiers and Northwestern Wildcats follow at 4:55 p.m. The Boilermakers will face the winner of the Indiana-Northwestern game at 6:30 p.m. Friday.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • The Problem...
    The issue I see is that we've never seen what the tourney attendance in Indy is when both IU and Purdue have strong teams as they traditionally have. Unfortunately, the Indy years started with very poor Purdue teams and now IU is near an all-time low. And, putting all bias aside, I think both programs will be good at the same time again (as they have been more often than not) in a few years. I think the tourney does great in Indy under those conditions but it may not happen in time. Chicago benefitted enormously in attendance from having some of the best Illini teams in the history of the school during the last year's they hosted. I think that with "normal" performance of all three programs over long periods of time the attendance in Indy will be fine vs. Chicago.
  • Marketing
    It's all about marketing. Why not offer all unsold tickets, the day of the game(s) for $10. Having a packed house even at a discount for some tickets is better than charging full price and having empty seats. Groupon could be used, too.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The Fringe! Plus, the simple fact that there are so many local faves in such close proximity to each other.

  2. I remenber, watching the toll road, being built, through South Bend, when I was 10 years old. I believe, back then that it was estimated, that the toll road, would be paid for in 20 years and then it would be free. I am now 71, what happened? Since the power is in the people, by that, I mean that, we the people are in total control of everything. I, suggest that no one ever use the toll road again, let it go broke. We the people can control the price of everything, from groceries to gas, if we would just do it. If we don't pay the asking price, the sellers will lower the price and if we wait awhile, they will lower the price to what we accept as reasonable. I would like to know why a highway like interstate 94, is so well maintained, a much better highway, than the toll road, but has no tolls. I would also like to know why, a sitting governor, with a term limit, maximum of eight years, can lease, public property, for 75 years. Even though I have transponders in both of my trucks and will not be affected by the increase, I have been and will contine to avoid using the toll road. I make many trips from northern Indiana to Chicago, every year, and I prefer the better highway, I94!

  3. Coming from her background,she should be used to those kinds of advances! Menard probably figured it was ok to tuck a buck!

  4. I'm still waiting for the list of available, high quality apartments in the Village.

  5. This criminal masquerading as a lawyer obviously has serious issues. He’s been proven by his own testimony to be a pathological liar and probably has a personality disorder as he seems to be constructing a reality around himself. He places no value on truth, honesty or loyalty as evidenced by what he has done to his clients and his own family. And by the demands and lies he has made in court, it is evident he feels entitled to do and say whatever suits his purpose and everyone else is expected to nod obediently and believe him because he is, after all, Bill Super Lawyer; or BS lawyer for short. This millionaire wanna-be no longer owns anything of value; he squandered it and put everything he had into foreclosure. He has no money, house, car, boat or vacation home left to show for what he earned or what he stole. He’s just another loser without morals who will be doing time. I’m certain all of his courtroom shenanigans are antagonizing his poor victims. As Lamar said, his behavior and claims in court have been outrageous. The judge needs to be more than concerned; he needs to be judicial and end this nonsense.

ADVERTISEMENT