IBJNews

Future of Big Ten tourneys in city unclear after 2012

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

When the Big Ten men’s basketball tournament tips off at Conseco Fieldhouse on Thursday afternoon, Indianapolis still is guaranteed to host the games the next two years.

But it remains uncertain whether the suburban Chicago-based athletic conference will keep the men’s and women’s tournaments in the city after 2012.

The Big Ten is planning to put the tournaments up for bid and have additional cities compete against Indianapolis for the right to host the games.

The Indiana Sports Corp., which led the charge to attract both tournaments to Indianapolis annually starting in 2008, is unsure when the bid process will begin.

“We don’t know the timing on that,” ISC spokesman John Dedman said. “We know that we have it through 2012, but we have not really looked beyond that.”

Big Ten spokesman Scott Chipman also said he is unclear about the timing of the bid process. He referred questions regarding whether the conference is satisfied with Indianapolis as the host city to Big Ten Commissioner James Delany. Delany could not be reached for comment Thursday morning.

What is certain, however, is that ticket sales will play a critical role in whether the tournaments stays in Indianapolis beyond 2012.

Rebounding from last year’s disappointing attendance could provide a lift. A poor economy helped to dampen demand, as attendance for the five sessions fell to 68,098, down from 80,012 in 2008.

Even a strong championship run through tournament by the Purdue Boilermakers wasn’t enough to offset an early exit by the Indiana Hoosiers.

Dedman at the Sports Corp. said demand for tickets typically is higher when both teams advance far into the tournament. Conversely, though, downtown hotels and restaurants benefit more when out-of-town visitors stay longer.

The Boilermakers enter the tournament this year as regular-season conference co-champions along with the Michigan State Spartans and Ohio State Buckeyes. Purdue is ranked No. 6 in the country. The Hoosiers finished next to last in the conference.  

Despite the Hoosiers’ on-court ineptitude, this year’s men’s tournament should be better attended. Dedman said ticket sales have surpassed last year’s numbers, although he couldn’t provide an exact count.

Strong attendance typically translates well for downtown hoteliers and restaurateurs. The Indianapolis Convention and Visitors Association estimates the men’s tournament generates about $8 million in direct visitor spending. Combined with the women’s Big Ten Tournament games, the figure grows to $10 million.

ICVA President Don Welsh said he'd love to keep the tournaments in Indianapolis.

“The Big Ten tournaments are important to our overall tourism industry, not just for the hotel rooms and restaurants they fill, but for the significant exposure they garner for our city to a regional audience,” he said via e-mail. “Our goal is that Indianapolis continues to be the home for the Big Ten tournaments for years to come.”

Indianapolis began hosting both tournaments annually in 2008, but the city’s relationship with the Big Ten begins well before that.  

With the exception of one year, the women’s tournament has been in Indianapolis since 1994 and in Conseco Fieldhouse since 1999. The men’s tournament, which began in 1998, was played in Chicago’s United Center through 2001, then alternated between Chicago and Indianapolis from 2002 to 2007.

In 2002, the first year the men’s tournament was in Indianapolis, attendance totaled 94,402. It’s never been that high since. Attendance declined to 77,012 in 2004, before rebounding to 90,763 in 2006.

Whatever the turnstiles read this year, tournament backers hope the Big Ten will take into account the city’s experience hosting the games when it comes time to choose a city.

The tournaments help to transform the city into a basketball bastion, particularly when NCAA tournament games are played here in subsequent weeks. The men’s Final Four will be in Indianapolis April 3-5.

“We’re trying to host the best event that we can, both men’s and women’s,” Dedman said. “That’s the best advantage that we have.”

The men’s tournament on Thursday tips off at 2:30 p.m. with a matchup between the Iowa Hawkeyes and Michigan Wolverines. The Hoosiers and Northwestern Wildcats follow at 4:55 p.m. The Boilermakers will face the winner of the Indiana-Northwestern game at 6:30 p.m. Friday.
 


ADVERTISEMENT
  • The Problem...
    The issue I see is that we've never seen what the tourney attendance in Indy is when both IU and Purdue have strong teams as they traditionally have. Unfortunately, the Indy years started with very poor Purdue teams and now IU is near an all-time low. And, putting all bias aside, I think both programs will be good at the same time again (as they have been more often than not) in a few years. I think the tourney does great in Indy under those conditions but it may not happen in time. Chicago benefitted enormously in attendance from having some of the best Illini teams in the history of the school during the last year's they hosted. I think that with "normal" performance of all three programs over long periods of time the attendance in Indy will be fine vs. Chicago.
  • Marketing
    It's all about marketing. Why not offer all unsold tickets, the day of the game(s) for $10. Having a packed house even at a discount for some tickets is better than charging full price and having empty seats. Groupon could be used, too.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Members must realize if you stop paying your dues you will lose. Why else would your employer honor the rtw bill. Before you take this step think about what you may be giving up in the long run. Very little of your dues money goes to any dem candidate. YOu will never know how much your republican employer gives his party with money he could be paying the employee. Who will step up and demand better wages or benefits if you have no representation. Union is the way for a better life. Our carpenter union offers a 4 year apprenticeship and 2 year degree from Ivy Tech all paid for with union dues . This is a great opportunity for kids who cant afford schooling after high school. The same opportunity is there for any person,any age, either sex to provide a better living for their family. Pension, anuity, health insurance all for your dues. How is this a bad choice.

  2. The FDIC is funded by assessments paid by banks, not taxpayers. That is not to say that bank customers don't ultimately pay the cost because, in the end, banks don't survive if they don't make profits.

  3. SCB Bank's failure is expected to cost the government $33.9 million,dont you mean middle class another bailout our government has no money

  4. Diogenes, the company did not call "pro-life" statements inflammatory. The IBJ article used the words "pro life."

    All, the company did, is what it should do which is apologize profusely for offending people with a program that offered statements that support an infamous apartheid proponent, Dr. Verwoerd, suggest that sometimes rape is justified, and quote Biblical text to people, not looking for it.

    If this is what you think is "insanity" then more companies need to behave insanely.

  5. I totally disagree with $45mil being given to the state Attorney General's office. That money is a waste. All of the money should go to help the homeowners & the people who were foreclosed on. Why such a big percentage to state govt? They'll get to start another agency staffed with people who have new-found power & don't care about the people they serve. As soon as the program was announced, I knew the states would end up with a huge chunk of the money for themselves that would just be squandered. Or maybe Mitch Daniels will just happen to "find" another big chunk of money that was "posted in the wrong section of the state's books."

ADVERTISEMENT