IBJNews

Georgia Street reconstruction project starts underground

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Work is under way on the $12.5 million transformation of a three-block stretch of Georgia Street downtown into a pedestrian-friendly corridor.

Crews have started burying utilities, a task that must be complete by December, said Larry Jones, deputy director of transportation for the city’s Department of Public Works. This week, the city also posted its notice seeking bids for construction work expected to begin in January.

The goal is to wrap up the project, which will make the street more pedestrian- and event-friendly, by next fall.otb-corridor-map

The revamped stretch between the expanded Indiana Convention Center, near Capitol and Georgia streets, and Conseco Fieldhouse, near Georgia and Pennsylvania streets, will still accommodate cars but will be designed such that it can easily be converted to an outdoor event space.

The bulk of the project will be covered by federal transportation grants, but the city must come up with $3.5 million of the total cost.

Michael Huber, the city’s deputy mayor for economic development, said the city’s contribution could come from the $35 million the city would get upfront from a proposed 50-year lease of its parking meters. But if that deal does not get City-County Council approval, Huber said, other money could cover the cost.

Another potential source of funds is the first chunk of the roughly $450 million the city will receive from the sale of its water and sewer utilities to Citizens Energy. That deal is awaiting approval from state regulators.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT