GOP forges ahead with Indiana redistricting

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Election maps proposed by Indiana Republicans for the state's congressional and legislative seats have fewer of the sprawling districts that Democrats put in place a decade ago.

The new maps are on track to win final legislative approval in the coming week. But Democrats dispute claims by Republicans that the proposed districts are more politically balanced, and leaders of a redistricting watchdog group say voters should have more time to weigh in on them.

Republicans who now fully control the Legislature and the redistricting process say they've followed their commitment to draw new districts that are compact and avoid splitting up cities and counties.

Democrats argue that Republicans are disingenuous in saying they don't know how slanted the maps are in the GOP's favor.

Democrats point to places like Bloomington and surrounding Monroe County, which now has two solidly Democratic Indiana House seats. The proposed map would leave the county with one district taking in most of Bloomington, while the rest of the county would be divided among four surrounding Republican districts.

"Despite whatever rhetoric everyone might put out there, these maps are political," said Democratic Rep. Matt Pierce of Bloomington. "They've been political every decade and this is no different."

Control of the 100-member Indiana House has typically been decided by five or fewer seats since the mid-1980s until last November's election gave Republicans a 60-40 majority. Democrats say 62 of the proposed districts would be solidly Republican and leave 14 closely contested districts — down from the current 24.

Republican legislative leaders counter that they didn't use political information on drawing the new maps — as required based on the 2010 census — and haven't released any analysis to dispute the Democrats.

Leaders of the Indiana Citizens Redistricting Commission say they're frustrated there hasn't been enough information released to the public to show how heavily packed individual districts are in favor of a particular party.

"They said they'd have transparency so everybody could see what was going on, and it is still being done in back rooms," said former Republican legislator Bill Ruppel, co-chairman of the commission, which was formed by state chapters of the League of Women Voters, AARP and the political watchdog group Common Cause/Indiana.

The Republican-proposed districts for Indiana — nine congressional, 50 state Senate and 100 state House seats — aren't available by online mapping programs or address searches so that a voter could easily determine which ones will be theirs. For instance, the only public way for someone to know for sure their new state House district would be to know their precinct number and search the 64-page listing on the House website, or to go through the bill listing for the Senate and congressional districts.

"Certainly in Indianapolis and the other urban areas there isn't any way to look at those maps and get a good sense at all what the districts are like," said Julia Vaughn, policy director for Common Cause/Indiana.

Ruppel said Republicans did well, however, at putting together more compact districts and splitting up fewer cities and counties. But he and other citizen commission leaders say that since state law only requires the congressional districts — not the legislative districts — be approved before the Legislature's April 29 adjournment deadline, more public hearings should be held around the state and those districts voted on in the fall.

Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma said the proposed districts weren't engineered for a political outcome and that the greatest population growth has been in traditional Republican suburban areas.

Bosma said the Democrat-drawn maps in place for the 10 years were "extraordinarily gerrymandered" and that Republicans had unprecedented openness in redistricting with committee hearings around the state before the districts were drawn.

"They had no public hearings with no maps in the past," Bosma said. "We've had nine public hearings and we've incorporated public testimony into the maps. They're on every website in the state that I can find. People can look at them."

Democrats also are criticizing what they call the unfair dilution of black and Hispanic voting strength for state Senate districts in Indianapolis and Fort Wayne by dividing those cities up with districts that reach into suburban areas for Republican voters.

"When you see communities divided up like that they usually try to dilute one party or the other," said Pierce, the Democratic legislator from Bloomington. "The pattern appears to be there in both the House and the Senate maps."

Senate Elections Committee Chairwoman Sue Landske, R-Cedar Lake, said Fort Wayne doesn't qualify for a minority population district and that the Indianapolis districts have been carefully drawn to conform with federal voting rights laws.

"We always have reached out into the collar counties ... just because of the numbers and preserving the minority districts," Landske said. "We did not want to dilute the minority vote. There is more representation in the Senate than there would be otherwise."


  • In an ideal world...
    Dems would stop worrying about the line drawing and start focusing on winning over the hearts and minds of moderate and independent voters. They are out there.
  • GOP forges ahead
    The Dem guy is correct. All re-districting is political but, given Speaker Gregg's hatchet job ten years ago, who can blame the Republicans?
    When the Dems win again, they will gerrymander again.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

  2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

  3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

  4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

  5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim