IBJNews

Hank FM lassoes ratings crown from rival WFMS

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WLHK-FM 97.1 “Hank FM" has put a backwoods butt-whupping on country rival WFMS-FM 95.5 to take the No. 1 spot in the metro Indianapolis radio market.

Owned by Indianapolis-based Emmis Communications Corp., WLHK saw it share rise from 7.3 in March to 8.6 in April, meaning  that on average 8.6 percent of the central Indiana market was listening during the month.

WFMS's share declined to 7.2 in April from 7.8 in March. Just last February, WFMS had an 8.6 share.

Meanwhile, Emmis’ soft rock WYXB-FM 105.7—known as “B105.7"—has tied with WFMS at the No. 2 position for April, according to the recent ratings released by Arbitron.

It’s the first time in recent history the same radio company has owned the No. 1 and No. 2 stations in the market, according to Emmis executives, who said they consulted with a ratings archivist to confirm the achievement.

“A while back we set some pretty lofty goals. In fact, some thought we were a little crazy,” Charlie Morgan, senior vice president and marketing manager for Emmis-Indianapolis, said in a statement.

The WFMS slap-down was undoubtedly gratifying for Morgan, a former executive at Cumulus Media Inc.-owned WFMS.

He’s not the only former WFMS staffer at Emmis. WLHK now employs former WFMS personality J.D. Cannon and executive Bob Richards, who is now program director and does on-air shifts at WLHK.

WLHK’s ascension to the top would have seemed preposterous when it switched to the format in 2005. Then, WFMS was the longtime local king of country and of the radio market in general.

Since then WLHK has been chipping away at WFMS, which hasn’t helped itself with a series of budget cuts in recent years by owner Cumulus.

Beside the departures of Cannon, Morgan and Richards, WFMS in 2009 let go of popular “Country Loving” host Darren Tandy. He was replaced by a syndicated show, "CMT Radio Live with Cody Alan."

Emmis’ WLHK, on the other hand, has put an emphasis on local personalities.

“With the exception of one countdown [syndicated show] on Saturday morning, we have local personalities on the air 24 hours, seven days a week,” Richards said.

Meanwhile, he credits the rise of WYXB to a share of 7.2, from 6.3 in January, to tweaks to the soft rock format and putting a premium on concert ticket giveaways.

An executive with WFMS didn't respond to a request for comment.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Ratings decline
    I am one of the defectors. I was a long time WFMS listener, but I just can't stand Nash Nights Live. I just want to listen to good music--not a bunch of silly, morning-talk-show-like banter in the evenings.
  • Follow-up?
    Will there be a follow-up to the story? HANK's reign lasted just 1 month. Radio Info - Indianapolis — For the fifth consecutive month, the market’s top two stations (6+) are country-formatted rivals. With a solid +1.1 to 8.3, Cumulus Media’s WFMS regains the lead. Conversely, following a strong +1.3 March-April showing, WLHK (Emmis’ “Hank”) slips back to second (8.6 – 7.8).
  • Excellent Job!
    HANK has been my favorite station for quite some time ... glad to see that everyone else is recognizing the quality of programming and talent that we have locally!! Way to Go!
  • Not surprised
    I am not surprised that WFMS is heading down the ratings pole. They get rid of the best people. JD, Vicki, the girl on Saturdays. The morning show can't carry them forever and this is proof.
  • O'Brien
    Did I miss something? How could you write this article and not mention Dave O'Brien? He's the only morning personality I can stand offering quite a bit more intelligence than any other in the city...or on satellite.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT