Hat World suing three former execs for contract breaches

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Hat World Inc. is suing three former executives for allegedly violating their contracts and non-compete clauses by starting a rival business and  attempting to take customers and employees with them.

Hat World filed the lawsuit in federal court in Indianapolis on Aug. 26. The complaint seeks monetary damages and a permanent injunction prohibiting the men from soliciting customers and employees for one year, and from disclosing any of Hat World's trade secrets.

Named as defendants are Thomas Handlen and two sons, Jeff and John Handlen, who were hired to lead the Lids Team Sports division created in 2009 following Hat World’s purchase of the Handlens’ Madison, Wis.-based company, Impact Sports.

Hat World, also known as Lids Sports Group, used the $4 million acquisition to help it grow its team sports business. The Lids Team Sports division now does business in 43 states.

The Handlens traveled to Indianapolis frequently following the sale and were in constant contact with Lids Team Sports sales reps, the suit said. But, on May 5, 2011, Hat World terminated the Handlens due to poor performance, the suit says.

“Sales representatives were quitting, communications with Hat World executive management was poor to non-existent, and the Handlens proved to be terrific salesmen but poor businessmen in terms of their ability to actually run the Lids Team Sports business,” the suit said.
Still, the Lids Team Sports division is performing quite well for Nashville, Tenn.-based Genesco, the parent company of Hat World.

Hat World generated sales in the latest fiscal year of $603 million, a nearly 30-percent increase from the previous fiscal year. The growth included a $46.7 million increase in sales from the Lids Team Sports business, primarily due to acquisitions, according to Genesco Inc.’s latest annual report.

Since their firing, the Handlens have attempted to rebuild Impact Sports, the lawsuit asserts.

The suit says Jeff Handlen contacted World Wide Promotions, the largest customer of Lids Team Sports, and offered to sell it embroidered or printed sports uniforms and apparel. The company would initially offer "generic” brands but would eventually carry top retail brands such as Nike or Adidas, Handlen said, according to Hat World’s complaint.

The suit also said the Handlens had unlimited access to business, development and marketing strategies of Lids Team Sports, and to other confidential information such as pricing and customer and vendor lists.

Besides monetary losses resulting from the Handlens’ conduct, Hat World also will “sustain intangible losses that cannot be remedied by any award” if a temporary restraining award and permanent injunction are not granted, the suit said.

“Use of the confidential information by a competitor would result in serious, irreparable harm to Hat World,” the complaint said.
Lids Team Sports maintained production and warehouse operations in Madison until the division moved to Indianapolis in December 2010.

Genesco announced in June 2010 that it would spend $22 million to expand the company’s Indianapolis headquarters and distribution operations.

Lids Sports Group, which employs about 250 at its Indianapolis headquarters and distribution center, announced in June 2010 that it would add as many as 571 jobs here by 2015 as part of the project. That included about 150 Impact Sports job production and distribution jobs moving from Madison.

Hat World is represented by David Given of Indianapolis-based law firm Baker & Daniels LLP.



  • Really????
    You won already, Hat World!You caused over 100 people to lose their jobs after you looked us all in the eyes and told us it would NOT happen!Leave us all alone and move on, we are trying to.Talk about Greed.If Hat World is so intimidated by Tom, Jeff and John,3 very intelligent small business men, then they should of kept them employed and not fired them!They will get thru this and we will support them.Loyalty and honesty, something Hat World knows nothing about!
  • Corporate Bullies!
    Just another example of big corporations pulling down the local businesses. People should be able to earn a living, non-compete contracts are unfair. Hat World has no idea how to run a team sports business and will continue to lose many customers.
  • Pro Handlens
    I hope the Handlens win!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.