HETRICK: Common threads weave through Pence, Obama speeches

Bruce Hetrick
January 26, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Bruce Hetrick

From the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., to the Statehouse in Indianapolis, there’s been a whole lot of speechifying going on.

In recent weeks, newly elected Indiana Gov. Mike Pence has delivered his inaugural address in the bitter cold of an outdoor ceremony and his state-of-the-state message in the warmer climes of the Indiana House chamber.

In between, recently re-elected President Barack Obama delivered his second inaugural address to the million-strong masses on the mall in Washington.

Two pols. Two parties. Seemingly opposite points of view.

Yet these polished communicators had plenty in common in what they said and how they said it to “we, the people.”

The cliché opening for political pontificating is the crossroads.

“Our city is at a crossroads,” says a mayor. “We’ve arrived at a crossroads,” says a governor. “We meet at a crossroads,” says a president.

But Pence and Obama said we’re past that.

Pence, citing the good work of his predecessor, Gov. Mitch Daniels, and the governors who preceded him, cast our state as good going on great.

Obama, four years into his presidency, noted that, “A decade of war is now ending” and “economic recovery has begun.”

Having passed beyond the proverbial crossroads, both Pence and Obama would have us believe we’re poised for the Promised Land.

“My fellow Americans, we are made for this moment and we will seize it, so long as we seize it together,” said Obama.

“This is our time to shine,” said Pence. And, “This is Indiana’s moment.” And, “We dare not squander this moment with complacency or self-congratulation.”

As basketball analyst Dick Vitale might say, “Carpe diem, baby.”

In an era of divisive politics, Pence and Obama stressed the importance of unity and public support if we’re to realize our potential. The people, they said, matter more than government.

“Through it all, we have never relinquished our skepticism of central authority,” said Obama, “nor have we succumbed to the fiction that all societies’ ills can be cured through government alone. Our celebration of initiative and enterprise, our insistence on hard work and personal responsibility, these are constants in our character.”

“Our state is poised for greatness,” said Pence. “The core of that greatness remains our people.”

“You and I, as citizens, have the power to set this country’s course,” said Obama. “You and I, as citizens, have the obligation to shape the debates of our time, not only with the votes we cast, but the voices we lift in defense of our most ancient values and enduring ideas.”

In calling people to lift their voices, both men repeatedly used the word “together.”

“Now, more than ever, we must do these things together, as one nation, and one people,” said Obama.

“Together, we will write the next great chapter of Indiana history,” said Pence.

“Together, we determined that a modern economy requires railroads and highways to speed travel and commerce, schools and colleges to train our workers,” said Obama. “Together, we discovered that a free market only thrives when there are rules to ensure competition and fair play. Together, we resolve that a great nation must care for the vulnerable and protect its people from life’s worst hazards and misfortune.”

“Together, we will build a more prosperous future,” said Pence. “Together, we will open doors of educational opportunity for all our kids. Together, we will approach our third century with confidence.”

So much togetherness. So little time.

As might be expected at inaugural events, both men waxed historic. Pence told the tale of Indiana’s flag and cited Indiana’s role in shaping Abraham Lincoln’s character.

Obama, speaking on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, covered the historic gamut from the nation’s founding to the civil rights movement to modern-day issues of equal pay for women, illegal immigration, climate change, tax reform and gay rights.

“The patriots of 1776 did not fight to replace the tyranny of a king with the privileges of a few, or the rule of a mob. They gave to us a republic, a government of, and by, and for the people. Entrusting each generation to keep safe our founding creed,” said Obama.

Despite admissions of obstacles to be overcome, Pence and Obama sounded strong notes of optimism.

“With so many families and businesses struggling just to get by, we have no choice but to remain bold, optimistic and relentless in our work until good jobs, great schools, safe streets and strong families become the hallmark of every community in this state,” said Pence.

“America’s possibilities are limitless,” said Obama, “for we possess all the qualities that this world without boundaries demands: youth and drive, diversity and openness, of endless capacity for risk and a gift for reinvention.”

Finally, with requests that God continue to bless each of us, our state and our nation, the pontificating was done and the more difficult work of implementation begun.

Good luck with that.•


Hetrick is an Indianapolis-based writer, speaker and public relations consultant. His column appears twice a month. He can be reached at bhetrick@ibj.com.


  • One Word Difference
    Yes, portions of their speech mimic each other. They both used the glory of individual accomplishment. Only one of the speeches had a very specific "qualifying" term...collective...inserted after founding principles and individual freedom.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.