IBJNews

HHGregg's profit, revenue rise, but same-store sales fall

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis-based HHGregg Inc. boosted its fourth-quarter profit thanks to 42 stores that opened during 2010, off-setting decreased sales at retail locations operating for more than a year.

The appliance and electronic retailer on Thursday reported profit of $14.6 million, or 36 cents per diluted share, compared to $10 million, or 25 cents a share, in the same period last year.

But same-store sales declined 10.8 percent, largely due to lower prices and less demand for emerging video technology during the fiscal quarter ended March 31. Overall revenue in the quarter reached $507 million, up 21.5 percent.

For the full fiscal year, HHGregg posted revenue of $2.1 billion and profit of $48.2 million, or $1.19 per diluted share—better than a revised $1.10-to-$1.15-per-share estimate made in February. Last year, the company reported profit of $39.2 million, or $1.03 per share.

“Despite industry headwinds and inclement weather around the Super Bowl selling period, we aggressively managed the business and delivered meaningful earnings growth in the fourth fiscal quarter,” CEO Dennis May said in a prepared statement.

Nevertheless, company leaders acknowledged that something must be done about the decline in same-store sales, which has persisted for two years.

May said the chain will address the problem through a number of initiatives during the 2012 fiscal year. Among them: increasing HHGregg’s share of the appliance market, enhancing the company’s online capabilities and launching a new advertising campaign.

HHGregg also plans to keep adding stores—as many as 45 in the current fiscal year, including its first locations in Pittsburgh, Miami and Chicago.

Founded in 1955, the chain had just 50 stores in 2004; it now has 173 and is building toward a goal of 600 locations coast-to-coast.

Despite the company’s growth, HHGregg shares lost about half of their value in the past year. Shares closed Wednesday at $12.96, up 11 cents for the day.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Galyans 2.0?
    I worked at Galyans (in a different city) years ago and was there when it got acquired by Dick's. Great store, great company, gone now. They expanded way too fast -- too many new stores and too many new markets (it makes more sense to open 3 stores in one new market than one store in each of three new markets) and didn't expand the back office infrastructure fast enough to keep up. Hopefully HHG won't turn into Best Buy as soon as the financial markets loosen back up, but we'll see...
  • HHGregg has really changed
    At one time, a person could go into HHGregg and find an employee who was well versed in their products. No more-they last two times I went in, the salesman knew nothing about the product I was interested in. One even said, ''I don't have a copy of the instructions, but, when you get it home and open the box you will find a copy and it will tell you how to use it''!! I wanted to know beforehand so I could decide which of several I wanted!! Similiar things have happened to other prospective buyers.

    Also, HHGregg once was very competitive on prices--------no more. Amazing how the public still thinks they are.
  • Red Flag
    This is Krispy Kreme all over again -- declining same store sales, aggressive opening of new stores (which will naturally perform better in the first few months until novelty wears off). This story won't end well.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT