IBJNews

HHGregg's profit, revenue rise, but same-store sales fall

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based HHGregg Inc. boosted its fourth-quarter profit thanks to 42 stores that opened during 2010, off-setting decreased sales at retail locations operating for more than a year.

The appliance and electronic retailer on Thursday reported profit of $14.6 million, or 36 cents per diluted share, compared to $10 million, or 25 cents a share, in the same period last year.

But same-store sales declined 10.8 percent, largely due to lower prices and less demand for emerging video technology during the fiscal quarter ended March 31. Overall revenue in the quarter reached $507 million, up 21.5 percent.

For the full fiscal year, HHGregg posted revenue of $2.1 billion and profit of $48.2 million, or $1.19 per diluted share—better than a revised $1.10-to-$1.15-per-share estimate made in February. Last year, the company reported profit of $39.2 million, or $1.03 per share.

“Despite industry headwinds and inclement weather around the Super Bowl selling period, we aggressively managed the business and delivered meaningful earnings growth in the fourth fiscal quarter,” CEO Dennis May said in a prepared statement.

Nevertheless, company leaders acknowledged that something must be done about the decline in same-store sales, which has persisted for two years.

May said the chain will address the problem through a number of initiatives during the 2012 fiscal year. Among them: increasing HHGregg’s share of the appliance market, enhancing the company’s online capabilities and launching a new advertising campaign.

HHGregg also plans to keep adding stores—as many as 45 in the current fiscal year, including its first locations in Pittsburgh, Miami and Chicago.

Founded in 1955, the chain had just 50 stores in 2004; it now has 173 and is building toward a goal of 600 locations coast-to-coast.

Despite the company’s growth, HHGregg shares lost about half of their value in the past year. Shares closed Wednesday at $12.96, up 11 cents for the day.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Galyans 2.0?
    I worked at Galyans (in a different city) years ago and was there when it got acquired by Dick's. Great store, great company, gone now. They expanded way too fast -- too many new stores and too many new markets (it makes more sense to open 3 stores in one new market than one store in each of three new markets) and didn't expand the back office infrastructure fast enough to keep up. Hopefully HHG won't turn into Best Buy as soon as the financial markets loosen back up, but we'll see...
  • HHGregg has really changed
    At one time, a person could go into HHGregg and find an employee who was well versed in their products. No more-they last two times I went in, the salesman knew nothing about the product I was interested in. One even said, ''I don't have a copy of the instructions, but, when you get it home and open the box you will find a copy and it will tell you how to use it''!! I wanted to know beforehand so I could decide which of several I wanted!! Similiar things have happened to other prospective buyers.

    Also, HHGregg once was very competitive on prices--------no more. Amazing how the public still thinks they are.
  • Red Flag
    This is Krispy Kreme all over again -- declining same store sales, aggressive opening of new stores (which will naturally perform better in the first few months until novelty wears off). This story won't end well.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT