IBJOpinion

HICKS: Good reads on America's automobile industry

Mike Hicks
August 21, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Mike Hicks

I think the history of the American automobile industry can be described in a couple of paragraphs. Here’s my try:

A century ago, the internal combustion engine cut the cost of moving people and goods. Large economies of scale and sleepy antitrust enforcement led to industry dominance by three domestic car makers. Labor unions forced these companies to share their monopoly profits with workers. These monopoly profits meant both the companies and the unions could afford highly placed friends in Congress. The unions overreached; management became complacent. Both the factories and the cars turned into a miserable joke.

Consumers got fed up and foreign competitors clobbered the Big Three. Neither management nor unions understood this quickly enough (over, say, 40 years) and the unions and industry needed a huge government bailout to avoid bankruptcy. This justified their earlier investment in politicians. An anti-bailout crowd swept into Congress (OK, that last bit is a forecast, not history).

If this paragraph does not satiate your interest in the domestic automobile market, may I recommend three fine books?

William J. Holstein’s “Why GM Matters” is a journalistic attempt to place a single American company back on its pedestal. I’m not convinced General Motors matters as much as Holstein thinks, but I am glad I read his book. It is especially helpful if you think the current GM is wholly a hapless desert of innovation. I especially liked his history of the Chevy Volt, the development of OnStar, and a little bit of history about the management and labor teams that have been so much in the news recently.

A must-read for any of us living in the Midwest is Abe Aamidor’s and Ted Evanoff’s “At the Crossroads: Middle America and the Battle to Save the Car Industry.” This book is especially interesting because it focuses so much on what has happened in Midwestern towns over the past couple of years. The narrative of Kokomo Mayor Greg Goodnight’s tireless efforts to bolster support for a bailout while flying off to Yale University to instruct management students is a classic tale. This is a great read.

Far and away, the best comprehensive popular history of the U.S. auto industry is Paul Ingrassia’s aptly titled “Crash Course.” Ingrassia has been the dominant chronicler of the auto industry over the past two decades, with frequent pieces in The Wall Street Journal and elsewhere. His intimate knowledge of the industry shows. This is a lively book that moves quickly from the early days of the industry to the present. He contrasts the performance of GM and Chrysler and Ford with insight as to the role of foreign competition. Ingrassia does a fine job explaining how many of the much-maligned labor rules (e.g., job banks) morphed from a simple way to stem layoffs to a caricature of inefficiency.

These three fine books bring to an end my summer reading. It was time well spent.•

__________

Hicks is director of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at cber@bsu.edu.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT