IBJNews

Hulman & Co. adds heavy-hitters to board

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Hulman & Co. announced Thursday that it is further expanding its board of directors with the appointment of four high-profile business leaders.

John Ackerman, Jeff Belskus, Mark Miles and Jim Morris have accepted their appointments. The appointments, all effective immediately, expand the board to 11 members.

John Ackerman is the co-founder and managing director of Cardinal Equity Partners, a private investment firm established in 1993.

Belskus is a long-time Indianapolis Motor Speedway executive who replaced Tony George as president two years ago.

Mark Miles is CEO of the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership. Miles also was the chairman of the 2012 Super Bowl Host Committee and former CEO of the ATP Tour, which helps oversee men’s professional tennis.

Morris is the president of Pacers Sports & Entertainment. Prior to joining PS&E, Morris served as the executive director of the United Nations World Food Program. A long-time business and civic leader in Indianapolis, Morris also has served as president of the Lilly Endowment Inc. and as chairman and CEO of IWC Resources Corp. and Indianapolis Water Co.

Morris also has served as chairman of the Indiana University board of trustees, chairman of the Indiana State University board of trustees in Terre Haute, treasurer of the U.S. Olympic Committee and a member of the board of governors of the American Red Cross.

Hulman & Co. appointed three new directors in February 2011 to expand its board from five to eight members, but a board vacancy was created with the death of Jerry Throgmartin on Jan. 22.

Until last year, the Hulman & Co. board was dominated by Hulman and George family members. The company has various holdings in Terre Haute and Indianapolis, most notably the company that manufactures Clabber Girl products and the Indianapolis Motor Speedway.

“Our experience in the last year with an expanded board has brought about significant new opportunity and has been beneficial in taking advantage of growth opportunities for our family of companies,” said Mari Hulman George, Hulman & Co. board chairwoman.

Other than Belskus, who remains as Speedway president and CEO, the new board members will have no day-to-day management duties with Hulman & Co., and there is no change in the management structure of the company.

The board members will be assigned to advisory committees that oversee various aspects of the business to assist in establishing best practices, identifying opportunities to increase efficiency, approving policies and strategies, and providing general oversight.

Hulman & Co.'s other board members are Mari Hulman George's four children—Nancy L. George, M. Josephine George, Katherine M. George-Conforti and Anton H. “Tony” George—along with Andre B. Lacy and Michael L. Smith.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What?
    Indycar needs Randy.
    Randy goes.. we all go.
    u know this is serious just like 96-97-98
  • Keep Randy
    Sad to hear what's going on. I hope the board will read these comments. Don't let owners meddle!
  • Keep Randy!
    Randy Bernard is the reason why I watch Indycar. When the split happened I was on the side if CART, I sat by and watched unification happen. I still wouldn't watch because I still didn't agree with the man in charge (Tony George). Putting Randy in charge brought me back, and keeps me here. He has done more for the sport in the last 20 years than anyone has.

    I boycotted the Indy 500 for 12 years, I really don't want to do that again because I love this sport too much. But I will.

    IF RANDY IS GONE SO AM I.
  • Bret..
    Brett you're are totally missing the point: this isn't about Randy and who is on the board, but rather letting the people on the board KNOW that we, the fans, support Randy and will stand behind him while a select few team owners try to plot to have him ousted.
  • Randy Bernard
    Don't plan on having me remain watching in person or on television if there is an ouster of Randy Bernard. The series is finally relevant again, and the owner cronyism is about to ruin everything that Randy and the fans have worked to restore. Stop meddling, or I stop watching.
  • #aim 4 feet again?
    You are on an huge upswing of credibility with Randy Bernard. Were you to make a move to replace him we are back to 1996 instantly.

    Do the right thing..
    Thanks for any appropriate consideration in this matter.
    Jp
  • What are you talking about?
    Randy Bernard has NOTHING to do with who is on the board. This doesn't effect his job one way or the other!
    • if Randy goes, I go!
      Randy Bernard is the best thing that has happened to Indycar in the last 20 years. This is a series that did everything it could to derail itself...from USAC to CART to the IRl...from CHRIS pook to Bobby Rahal to Tony George...and RAndy is the only one who proved he could "right the ship" and make Indycar relevent again.

      I have gone to at least 1 Indycar race each of the past 10 years, and have gone to 2-3 Indycar races in each of the past 4 years.I was going to buy tickets to Baltimore & Iowa for this year, but mark my word if Randy gets the boot, I will NEVER AGAIN give Indycar even $1 of my support.

      I almost walked away for good after "The Split" but my love for Indy brought me back. But if Randy goes, I'm gone. For good.
    • Indy500
      I have been a fan for over 40 years. I know more about that race than the folks on the board. Randy goes...I go. Am I Clear?

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. liek the rest of America

      2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

      3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

      4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

      5. whoa!

      ADVERTISEMENT