The oil industry says a new oil pipeline from Canada to the Gulf Coast might create jobs for Indiana residents if the Obama
administration approves its construction. But Indiana environmentalists say the state should focus on modernizing its auto
industry to make clean cars instead.
American Petroleum Institute President Jack Gerard told a crowd in Indianapolis Tuesday that the $7 billion Keystone XL pipeline
would create new work for more than 100 Indiana companies. He did not specify which companies.
If built, the 1,700-mile pipeline planned by Calgary-based TransCanada would travel through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska,
Kansas and Oklahoma before reaching refineries in Houston and Port Arthur, Texas.
Supporters say the line, which would carry an estimated 700,000 barrels of oil a day, could significantly reduce U.S. dependence
on Middle Eastern oil.
"We've made the case that you have the option of getting oil from Canada or from a petro-dictator in another country.
To us it's a pretty straightforward equation," said Canadian Ambassador to the U.S. Gary Doer, who attended Tuesday's
conference on energy jobs.
But opponents say it would bring "dirty oil" that requires huge amounts of energy to extract and could cause an
ecological disaster in case of a spill.
Hoosier Environmental Council Executive Director Jesse Kharbanda said Indiana should keep its focus on industries more tied
to the state.
"An approach that puts more of an emphasis on modernizing the automobile sector would be extremely beneficial to a manufacturing
state like Indiana," Kharbanda said.
The pipeline project has been in the planning and review stage for years and has become a flashpoint for President Barack
Obama's energy policies. The U.S. State Department, which has authority over the pipeline because it crosses an international
boundary, is expected to make a decision on the project by year's end.

















IBJ Conversations
5 Comments
Add Comment
If this line would go right through your property, would you keep the same outlook? If this line took away your home, would you still promote it? If you had a major gas leak into the water source your family and children use to drink, would you argue for it?
The oil is going to either be used by us or China. Why not US. The emissions are going to go into the atmosphere either way, why shouldn't our economy benefit instead of China's? Are you so bent on the destruction of our country you would sacrifice your friends and neighbors in pursuit of a utopian goal of the few? The automotive industry is making great strides at reducing the pollution output of current vehicles with plans to go farther. Alternative fuel vehicles are proliferating but if our current administration gets their way, no one will be able to afford the electricity to charge them. Then what? Solar cars? Bicycles? How about horses? Oh, right, they also pass emissions into the atmosphere. Wait, humans also pass emissions. Are you suggesting the end of humanity in order to preserve mother earth?
We should build the pipeline immediately using the latest safety technologies and try our best to error-proof the entire route and all connection points. Let the environmentalists take another herbal remedy for their acid indigestion over their fretting about the possibility of a spill of a substance that already comes from the very ground on which it would spill.
demanding more of a finite product does not decrease price for that product. Also, we have been the largest user of oil by far for decades, why are we in such bad shape? Oil is the subsidized blood of our nation. You seem to be against government expenditures, but you advocate subsidy for your lifestyle? Perhaps you could use a breif vacation to find yourself, because you are very confused.