IBJNews

Indiana tourism effort honors famed course designer Dye

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana tourism leaders have recruited legendary golf course architect Pete Dye to help promote a new effort that will showcase some of his best designs and draw more visitors to the state.

Dye joined Gov. Mitch Daniels and other officials Thursday morning at Brickyard Crossing in Indianapolis to launch the Pete Dye Golf Trail, a collection of seven public courses he selected for the campaign.

Besides Brickyard Crossing, other courses on the trail are The Fort Golf Resort and Maple Creek Golf & Country Club in Indianapolis; Plum Creek Golf Club in Carmel; Mystic Hills Golf Club in Culver; Kampen Course in Lafayette; and The Pete Dye Course at French Lick.

Tourism officials are marketing the trail as an opportunity to give both Hoosiers and visitors an opportunity to play Dye-designed courses at a reduced rate. Players who complete the trail within a calendar year will be rewarded with a commemorative gift.

Jeff Williams, Brickyard Crossing’s director of golf, said he's honored that Dye chose the course to be part of the trail.

“Indiana has the best collection of Pete Dye courses in the country, and he happens to live here,” Williams said. “We are so proud to be a part of the deal.”

Dye, 85, has designed about 90 courses, including more than 20 in Indiana, the most of any state. He said he's proud of all his creations, but one in particular on the trail—his course at French Lick—draws his highest praise. It opened in 2007.

“That was the ultimate golf course I ever built,” Dye told IBJ. “It’s on the highest point in southern Indiana. It’s unbelievable. You can see for miles down there.”

The Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Association has begun promoting the trail with a 30-second television advertisement airing on the Golf Channel in the Chicago and Louisville markets.

“He is revered worldwide as the father of golf course architecture,” the segment says. “This is your invitation to travel his home state in Indiana and play a collection of courses that could only come from the mind of Pete Dye.”

The ICVA, in partnership with the Indiana Office of Tourism Development and convention bureaus near the courses, plans to seek state funding to place signage along the interstates.

Signs in Alabama promoting its Robert Trent Jones Trail caught the eye last year of Daniels, who suggested the ICVA help launch a similar attraction in Indiana.

The Alabama trail, which features 26 courses from designer Jones, consistently has ranked as one of the state’s top tourist destinations since opening in 1992.

ICVA spokesman Chris Gahl recalled a conversation with the governor in which he asked if the association could create a similar trail to honor Dye. ICVA spent the past year with officials from the courses Dye selected to coordinate the project.

“If you look at Michigan and Florida and what they’ve done with golf tourism, Indiana had an opportunity because Pete and Alice Dye are residents,” Gahl said.

Dye, who moved to Indianapolis from Ohio in 1950 after marrying Alice, has been an ambassador for the game for more than 50 years.

He worked on a golf course as a youngster and became greens keeper at the Fort Bragg base course in North Carolina while serving in the Army following World War II.

No slouch with the clubs either, Dye won the Indiana State Amateur Championship in 1958 and finished second twice.

But it’s his designs that catapulted him into golfing fame. He built his first course, the Eldorado in Greenwood (now called Dye’s Walk Country Club), in 1960.

The then-president of the University of Michigan, Harlan Hatcher, played the course on a trip to Indiana, Dye recalled. Impressed with the layout, Hatcher commissioned Dye to design a course for the university.

“I’ve been building ever since,” Dye said. “Isn’t that something?”

More information on the trail is available here.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT