Timber industry seeks respect, profit from 'green' standards

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

“Green” buildings are designed to save energy and go easy on the environment through using such materials as bamboo, the fast-growing tropical grass that can be harvested in just five or six years.

So imagine the frustration for some Indiana hardwood growers when an architect specifies not hardwood but bamboo or even steel.

How many tons of carbon dioxide were emitted by the diesel freighter hauling bamboo from Asia or by the belching steel mills that have made Northwest Indiana such a garden spot—not?

hardwood“I ask myself, ‘How can this be green?’” said Robert Woodling, owner of Robert Woodling Timber, a 100-acre hardwood farm in Unionville, just northeast of Bloomington.

Woodling grows more trees than he cuts, built his mill from local wood, and powers his vehicles with homemade bio-diesel.

“There’s a group of woodland owners who’ve been sustainable long before it became a buzzword,” added Woodling, who sports a beard more akin to a dignified college professor than a lumberjack and wields tools out of the Spanish Inquisition to goad logs into processing machines.

Yet, hardwood growers and wood product manufacturers still struggle for acceptance in systems that rate construction materials for their green credentials.

That means the Hoosier industry stands to miss out on a new wave of customers—a big deal for a state with more acres, 4.6 million, in forest than the size of Connecticut and Rhode Island combined. Among the most popular hardwoods grown in Indiana are ash, oak, hickory, cherry and walnut.

The most prevalent green building rating system, known as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or LEED, is a voluntary approach developed by the U.S. Green Building Council. The system assigns points for design and the way materials are used, and can be a good guide for energy and environmental performance.

There are different levels of performance. For example, under the LEED commercial interior category, 50 to 59 points earns you a “silver” certification. Greenies wanting maximum chest-thumping rights must earn 80 points for a “platinum” rating.

All this sounds rather systematic and straightforward. But there’s a problem if you’re one of the vast majority of family-owned hardwood growers in Indiana, with modest land holdings and a budget to match. It turns out that not just any “wood” qualifies for points under USGBC rules. Rather, LEED recognizes wood grown under standards of the Forest Stewardship Council, an organization that promotes sustainable growing practices around the world.

hardwood Tree grower Robert Woodling isn’t the only member of the Hoosier hardwood industry questioning why some imports meet environmental standards while locally sourced materials struggle for acceptance. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Generally, use of FSC-certified wood earns a couple of points toward a LEED score.

Certifying the wood requires growers to track their trees essentially from origin through harvest. For the modest grower just trying to make ends meet, it’s a pile of bureaucracy on top of the already-dense government rules, particularly for those operating in the highly regulated environmental realm.

“FSC is not easy to obtain, and most of the forests in the region don’t obtain it,” said Luke Leising, chairman of the USGBC’s Indiana chapter and sustainability director at architecture and engineering firm American Structurepoint.

Indeed, nearly 86 percent of Indiana forests are privately owned, and many have 10- to 40-acre tracts owned by families for years. For some, “it’s just physically impossible to jump through the hoops,” said Ray Moistner, executive director of the Indiana Hardwood Lumbermen’s Association.

Plan ’B’

So the association is trying to help members exploit another aspect of LEED that could favor Indiana hardwoods. It turns out that using wood sourced “locally,” within 500 miles, can qualify for up to three LEED points—whether its Forest Stewardship-certified or not.

So then, why do growers have their overalls in a twist?

They say some architects and others in the green building world apparently don’t realize or appreciate the locally sourced provision. Some working on a green building project will call one of Moistner’s members to inquire whether they’re Forest Stewardship-certified. Often a member will reply, no. But before he can explain there are still points to be earned under the local sourcing rule, “they’ll hang up the phone,” Moistner said.

hardwoodThe challenge isn’t limited to Indiana.

The USGBC national office has received grief from the hardwood industry over its use of the Forest Stewardship standards. Leising said the office is aware of the hardwood industry’s concerns, and that there’s talk of broadening the standard.

Novel approaches

But Indiana is one of few states trying a novel approach to improve green building sourcing opportunities for the hardwood industry.

The state previously obtained Forest Stewardship certification for state-owned forests, some of which are opened to private logging. Logs harvested are considered certified if they go through the proper chain of custody, and a number of Indiana mills are custody-approved.

The Indiana Department of Natural Resources for decades also has helped private woodland owners receive recognition for good stewardship through a forest and wildlife classification program. About 12,000 landowners, with upward of 650,000 acres, are voluntarily participating in the classification system, under which they must adhere to standards for such considerations as soil erosion and harvest inventories. Woodland owners in return receive tax breaks for following good environmental practices.

But about two years ago, DNR began trying to obtain Forest Stewardship certification for woodlands enrolled in its classified system. Pooling woodlands essentially reduces costs and hurdles private owners enrolled in the program would otherwise incur. No other state, with the possible exception of Minnesota, has gone this route, said assistant state forester Dan Ernst. He said DNR hopes to get the green light from Forest Stewardship within months.

Tim Maloney, senior policy director of the Hoosier Environmental Council, said his group supports responsible timber harvests on private lands “with the recognition it has to be done in the context of other resources,” such as water, soil quality and wildlife.

The council has questioned the state’s increased access to private loggers of state-owned forests, saying it has increased under the current administration. State land remains an important wildlife and recreational resource, Maloney said.

“From our standpoint, we certainly have questions whether this [logging] is the best use of these lands.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!