Indiana House Dems boot Bauer, install Lawson as leader

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Patrick Bauer, who stared down Gov. Mitch Daniels and other Republicans during his stormy tenure leading Democrats in the Indiana House, was ousted Thursday by disgruntled members of his caucus who said they needed new leadership to regain seats in the General Assembly.

The legislator who has spent 42 years in the Statehouse didn't attend the meeting and learned of the results through Twitter. He quickly conceded defeat and threw his support behind his successor, Rep. Linda Lawson of Hammond.

"There's no question it was painful because these were people who I helped get elected," Bauer said after the vote to make Lawson the new minority leader.

House Democrats now have about three months before potentially grueling general elections in November. Democrats are outnumbered 60-40 in the House and could be furthered marginalized if Republicans win the 67 seats necessary to overcome stall tactics like the ones Bauer used in 2011 and 2012 to fight right-to-work legislation.

House Republicans drew new House districts this year that fortified their chances of picking up more seats in November.

Members of the caucus said they hoped Bauer's removal would help them raise money and energize support.

Lawson said Democrats had many reasons for removing Bauer. They wanted Democrats running for office to focus on new issues such as the federal health care law and higher education, but what it came down to, for most of them, was being included in the decision-making.

"Honestly, 40 heads are better than one," Lawson said after Thursday's vote at a union hall.

It was Bauer who found himself boxed out Thursday after a decade of running the caucus, leading them in battles against Daniels as speaker and, while in the majority the last two years, on extended walkouts designed to block right-to-work legislation.

Speaking less than an hour after Indiana's House Democrats voted to replace him, Bauer said he had yet to hear from any of the members who voted for his removal.

Democrats running for the Indiana House now have a new team of leaders helping them through November's elections. Thursday's vote to remove Bauer also signaled a change in what Democrats think will help them win elections.

"It's just two polar opposite strategies," said Rep Ed DeLaney of Indianapolis. "One is one person knows it all, controls it all, decides it all, and has very few meetings. The other model says we try to get the best out of every one of our members — we may have some disagreements, but we have our team approach."

Bauer's ouster occurred during a meeting attended by 23 of the 40 members of the caucus. Afterward, they refused to say how each member had voted.

The group also picked three caucus members to act as deputies to Lawson in running the Democratic House campaigns: Ryan Dvorak of South Bend, Matt Pierce of Bloomington and Craig Fry of Mishawaka.

Many House Democrats were unhappy with Bauer's handling of campaign fundraising and spending heading into November, where they're hoping to shore up their position after bruising losses in 2010 left Republicans with 60 seats.

Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma has said he believes the GOP can win 67 seats in November. That would give Republicans a super majority allowing them to conduct business without any Democrats present.

If that happens, it would remove the last vestiges of clout held by Democrats, who, under Bauer, staged walkouts in 2011 and 2012 in an effort to block divisive right-to-work legislation. The five-week walkout succeeded in blocking the legislation in 2011, but periodic walkouts failed to derail the measure this year, and Gov. Mitch Daniels signed it into law.

Bauer said Wednesday that the caucus began to splinter during the 2011 walkout, when some members stayed in an Urbana, Ill., hotel while others remained in Indianapolis.


  • Hiding in Illinois
    After this devastating news, im sure the wigged one is hiding out in an Illinois hotel on the back of the DNC.
  • Wha Hoppenned?
    I have a hunch the right to work legislation is behind Bauer's ouster. The unions probably pulled their support when Bauer wasn't able to derail it, even though the elected representatives of the majority of voters in Indiana strongly favored it. If you're a democrat and you lose union support, it's game over. His caucus members don't want the unions to bail on them, so they threw him under the bus. It's not about party unity, folks, it's about money. That's true for both parties, not just for democrats.
  • Huh?
    I concur with your comment about hats off to the dems getting rid of that old blowhard. But what else are you trying to say? I think Bosma's doing a great job.
  • Term Limits
    We need term limits. When politicians view public service as a "Cash Cow Job" and they lose focus on the true needs of the state, it is because special interests control their votes, their bills, and the needs of the special interests. I would like to see a referendum for term limits. Let the voters decide.
  • Yer outa there!
    It's good to see that some dems have some sense. I say to Bauer, don't let the door hit you in the butt. It is refreshing to have his arrogance and power mongering finally recognized by his own party. Now I only can hope that the people of his district (South Bend/Mishawaka area) will wake up and finish the job of ousting him in November.
  • Huh?
    because Indiana is in such bad shape? all of you rubes do what is best for your party - not for the people. wake up.
  • My prayers were answered
    My hats off to the Democrats. Now Bosma keep looking over your shoulder. We get rid of you. And maybe we can get some work done for the people of Indiana. A great day !

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

    2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

    3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

    4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

    5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing