Indiana legislative panel endorses test of iPads

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An Indiana legislative panel endorsed a pilot program Monday that would equip two General Assembly committees with iPads in the upcoming session as part of a push to cut the amount of paper used to print copies of bills for lawmakers.

The Legislative Council's data-processing subcommittee voted 3-0 Monday to endorse a report asking the full council to embrace the pilot iPad project. The 16-member council will consider that and other suggested technology upgrade recommendations at its Nov. 21 meeting.

Republican Sen. Brandt Hershman of Lafayette, who chairs the panel, said it heard compelling testimony Monday that about 250 pounds of paper is printed out for each of Indiana's 150 lawmakers each session in the form of various versions of bills and amendments.

Research by a Ball State University technology expert who testified before the panel also concluded that on average 11,400 pages are printed for each bill considered by lawmakers as the legislation meanders through the process.

Hershman said using iPads to review bills downloaded from a legislative website holds the potential to boost efficiency and cut down on printing costs. He said it's unclear how much those savings might ultimately be.

"We may be on a path toward becoming a leader in this process of going totally paperless, toward total adoption, but that's yet to be determined," Hershman said after Monday's meeting.

He said he's going to recommend that the Senate Tax and Fiscal Policy committee adopt iPads for the pilot project. Hershman said the House Education committee could be the pilot committee in the House if the council approves the project.

All 100 of Indiana's House members and its 50 state senators are already assigned a laptop for use in their legislative duties. Hershman said he knows of only one lawmaker, whom he declined to name, who does not use their laptop.

The subcommittee's four members each received iPads earlier this year and have spent several months using the popular Apple tablet to determine how easy they are to use.

Senate Minority Leader Vi Simpson, a Bloomington Democrat who's on the subcommittee, said that although she had some learning to do when she received her iPad, she now uses it considerably more than she does her state-issued laptop.

"It's a different keyboard. There's a little different feel to it. But as someone who doesn't do computers very well, I just love it. And the more I learn about it the easier it gets," she said.

Simpson said that as bills are discussed during legislative hearings she marks any changes into papers copies of those bills, along with questions she has about those measures. Sometimes, she misplaces her marked-up copies of bills and regrets when that happens.

But Simpson said she's been assured that adopting iPads will make it far easier for lawmakers to make such changes on digital versions of each bill without the risk of losing them. She also believes that if she and her colleagues do embrace iPads, the change will simplify the legislative process and make updated bills more quickly available to the public.

"Right now it's just so complicated: There's so many changes and so much paper that you have to get. But this could simplify things for the public as well as for us," she said.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.