IBJNews

Indy airport sends CEO Clark packing

 IBJ Staff
December 28, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Year In Review
More
Stories
City successfully stages Super Bowl, shoots for another Indiana adopts right to work WellPoint investors force Braly ouster Judge lays into Durham, sentences him to 50 years ISO reaches new contract, launches fundraising spree Developers unleash blitz of apartment projects Hoosier voters tap Pence to continue Daniels' legacy Daniels wins presidency—at Purdue City projects move ahead, following clash over TIF Indy airport sends CEO Clark packing In election shocker, voters bounce schools chief Bennett Bernard bounced as IndyCar Series CEO Digital marketer ExactTarget splashed onto NYSE


Newsmakers
2012
                              NEWSMAKER: School librarian Ritz won with grass-roots campaign 2012
                              NEWSMAKER: Crime stance returns Hogsett to political spotlight 2012 NEWSMAKER:
                              Council Dem Mahern plays role of antagonist 2012 NEWSMAKER: CEO keeps Simon stock surging 2012 NEWSMAKER:
                              Miles adds to diverse business, sports career Other 2012 news
                              of note

When John D. Clark was hired as CEO of the Indianapolis Airport Authority in 2009, he was hailed by then-airport board president Randall Tobias as “an all-star.”

The former head of Jacksonville, Fla.’s airport authority, Clark was seen as a visionary on best practices for growing non-airline revenue, such as retail sales.

clark-airport-15col.jpg Frequent overseas travel generated controversy for former airport CEO John Clark. (IBJ file photo)

Never mind that Jacksonville’s media ran accounts of Clark making enemies among city council members and airport police and of frequent jaunts to international destinations, including Shanghai, Brussels, Frankfort, Paris, London and Buenos Aires.

Tobias defended such trips, saying they were part of Clark’s distinguished role as chairman of the board of Airports Council International North America. Clark was well-traveled enough to see what worked at other airports around the world.

But last March, the authority let Clark go, saying little about why.

It appears Mayor Greg Ballard was unhappy with the pace of economic development at the airport, where the old terminal complex still sits covered in weeds after four years. The general pace of development at the airport is nothing to brag about.

“I think that’s been slow, much slower than I would have expected,” Ballard told IBJ’s news-gathering partner, WXIN-TV Channel 59.

Clark, 51, also became a lightning rod for local media scrutiny that became embarrassing to the mayor, scrutiny invited by Clark’s penchant for travel.

IBJ found that, in 2011 alone, Clark and two key Indianapolis airport officers spent more than $67,000 on travel that included extended trips to Brazil, Denmark, Greece, Morocco and Switzerland.

The trips were not on the taxpayers’ dime, Clark said, noting that the itinerary included meetings with European firms that later expanded cargo operations in Indianapolis. Some of the travel was for executive training at industry conferences.

In the end, Clark received $270,000 in severance pay plus unearned vacation pay. New airport board President Michael Wells put the kibosh on international travel and began to realign management ranks at the airport. He replaced Clark with retired Indianapolis airport executive Robert Duncan.

Today, Clark operates Atlanta-based aviation consultancy JClark Aviation Group.

Clark’s contributions while at Indianapolis include land-use planning in cooperation with surrounding cities and towns to maximize the airport’s role as an economic development engine benefiting the broader region.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Come on, Mayor
    Mayor Ballard is delusional. The reason there's nothing going on at the airport is because Indianapolis is nowhere. You can't fly anywhere from here. You don't want to come back. Ballard needs scapegoats. I've already got one. Ballard himself, for building this white elephant.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT