IBJNews

Indy council Democrats pitch budget alternative

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

City-County Council Democrats are pitching a 2014 budget alternative that would close an $8-million gap left by the majority party's refusal to go along with Mayor Greg Ballard on eliminating the homestead tax credit.

"At the end of the day, it's a property-tax increase and people are telling councilors they don't want to absorb it," said John Barth, the council vice president.

The Democrats' proposal calls for pulling money from the city's IT-services agency and the parking-meter fund, both of which are projected to have multi-million dollar balances at the end of 2014.

Barth unveiled the proposal Monday afternoon, as Republicans were preparing to bring the homestead tax credit elimination before the full council for a last-ditch vote. Ballard's $1 billion budget hinges on eliminating the tax credit, a move that would raise property taxes in some areas but would also mean a big boost in income-tax revenue.

The measure was defeated in a committee earlier this month on a 4-3, party-line vote. Barth said Democrats have been working on an alternative regardless. He wasn't sure Monday whether Ballard would accept it.

Ballard's chief of staff, Ryan Vaughn, has been unable to sway Democrats on eliminating the homestead tax credit, despite introducing a companion measure that would mitigate the tax-revenue impact on Indianapolis Public Schools and offering to spend $7 million out of the city's $80 million fiscal-stability fund on the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department.

"To us, the homestead credit is done, and you have to deal with the consequences," Barth said. The Democrats instead want to pull $3.1 million from the Information Services Agency, which was counting on the money for long-term capital projects, and $4.5 million from the parking-meter fund, which is projected to end 2014 with $5.8 million.

Typically the parking-meter fund is spent on public works, but Barth pointed to a provision in the city code that gives the council the right to transfer any "unneeded balance" to the general fund.

Along with eliminating the homestead tax credit, Ballard has proposed expanding the boundaries of the IMPD taxing district to capture the entire county. That could mean a property-tax increase for homeowners outside of Center Township, if they aren't already hitting the state-mandated property-tax cap. The move would also offset the impact of eliminating the homestead tax credit on IPS.

The IMPD taxing district expansion is on the agenda Monday evening, and Barth said he expects it to pass. He hopes Ballard will take that as a compromise and leave the additional $7 million for IMPD on the table.

Republican Councilor Marilyn Pfisterer said her caucus hoped to revive the homestead credit elimination Monday. "I don't understand this vociferous opposition," she said of the majority party.

Pfisterer acknowledged that there's been opposition from schools, but she said they have back-up funding sources from the state. IMPD, meanwhile, would take an $8-million hit next year if the budget isn't level-funded.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • no tax
    We as property owners in Marion County want to keep our property taxes low. We don't want the elimination of the Local Homestead Tax Credit. We will be putting our homes up for sale and get out of this county. They will not use the money for what it's intended for anyway. Another way of getting our money for what, crooked politics.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT