Inlow estate decision reversed by high court

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Supreme Court on Wednesday delivered some good news to the widow of former Conseco Inc. chief counsel Lawrence Inlow, reversing a lower court’s order that she pay his estate $284,034 for funeral expenses.

Inlow was killed in 1997 when he was struck in the head by a blade of a company helicopter. He had no will.

Anita Inlow paid the funeral and burial expenses herself, then was reimbursed by the estate. Lawrence Inlow’s four children from a previous marriage later sought to recover the money after the Carmel insurance company settled a wrongful-death lawsuit for nearly $885,000.

The widow argued that none of the proceeds from the wrongful-death settlement should be used for funeral and burial expenses because that purpose wasn’t specifically addressed in the settlement agreement.

If the money goes to the estate, as a Hamilton County trial court ordered in 2007, Anita Inlow said she won’t get any of the lawsuit proceeds since she already has settled her interest in the estate.

But the Supreme Court stopped short of saying the estate isn’t entitled to any reimbursement.

Instead, the high court ruled that a portion of the wrongful-death settlement proceeds should be applied toward those expenses, since Indiana’s Wrongful Death Act includes language that specifically refers to medical, hospital, funeral and burial expenses as a component of total damages in such cases.

The Inlow case now goes back to the trial court to determine how much that will be.


  • Inlow Estate
    Someone explain to me how you can spend $284,000 on funeral expenses? What additional expenses were included?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...