IBJNews

Inventor files suit against local printing business

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The former owner of packaging firm Discom Technologies has filed suit against buyer Harding Poorman Group Inc. and subsidiary SPG Graphics, alleging he was shorted a percentage of Discom sales he was to have collected after the sale.

Jeffrey S. Combs also alleges in the suit brought last month in Marion Superior Court that the Indianapolis graphics and publishing company later dissolved Discom, rendering his remaining 20-percent stake worthless.

Combs devised and patented a method to bind compact discs and their sleeves into printed materials. The vinyl compact disc sleeve can run through binding equipment with the disc enclosed, allowing the disc and sleeve to be placed anywhere in a book. According to the suit, he sold 80 percent of Discom to SPG Graphics in July 2005, receiving an initial payment of $1.6 million.

Combs said the sales agreement further required SPG to pay him quarterly “override” payments—essentially a commission—for five years, based on 7 percent of Discom’s sales.

He alleges SPG failed to disclose all of the sales that involved Discom’s patented products, upon which his quarterly commission was based.

“Combs recently learned that SPG failed to credit Discom for a number of substantial sales,” states his suit.

The entrepreneur alleges that after his 2007 termination he attempted to sell his remaining 20-percent interest in Discom to Harding Poorman as the sales agreement stipulated, but did not receive a response. He alleges that SPG told employees that SPG bought the remaining 20 percent, and that it in 2009 “made the unilateral decision to dissolve Discom and liquidate its assets.”

Discom is still listed on Harding Poorman’s Web site as one its business units.

Harding Poorman principal David A. Harding, who was also named as a defendant, denies the allegations.

“We don’t think his claims have any merit and we’re defending those claims in court. Other than that we have no comment,” said Harding.

Among Combs’ allegations are breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, minority member freeze-out and constructive fraud. The suit does not specify a  dollar amount of damages.

Harding Poorman lists annual sales of $24.8 million.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT