IBJNews

IURC to re-examine Duke project amid ethics flap

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission said it will review four years of cases regarding Duke Energy Corp.’s expensive Edwardsport coal-gasification plant amid a growing ethics controversy involving the company and state regulators.

The commission has also summoned Jim Rogers, the CEO of North Carolina-based Duke, to justify anew the need for the Edwardsport plant, during a hearing on Nov. 3.

In addition, the State Ethics Commission on Thursday filed formal charges against Scott Storms, the IURC former top attorney, for negotiating a job with Duke even as he participated in decisions regarding Duke and its Edwardsport plant. That behavior violates state conflict-of-interest statutes, the complaint alleges.

The Ethics Commission had initially OK’d attorney Storms’ September switchover to work at Duke.

Storms’ contact with Duke officials emerged in e-mails discovered in a probe by Gov. Mitch Daniels’ office, according to Duke. Daniels fired former IURC Commissioner David Hardy on Oct. 5 over the matter and Duke placed its Indiana CEO on administrative leave.

Now, the IURC has opened up its own investigation into the ethics flap, the commission announced Thursday.

Duke’s Edwardsport plant has been controversial as the costs for building it have climbed to $2.9 billion from initial estimates near $1.5 billion. In July, Storms signed off on Duke’s request to pass those costs on to customers.

The Edwardsport plant is already about 70 percent complete, and Duke recently reached a settlement with consumer groups to cap the plants costs at $2.975 billion. Those costs, when passed on to Duke customers, would raise their bills by about 16 percent between now and 2013.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • "Flap" devalues the story
    This is a major story that probably costs ratepayers millions and the IBJ uses the shallow, devaluing term "flap" as if it were a non-serious situation.
  • Interesting, but...
    ....didn't I read about all this stuff in the Indy Star?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

  2. John Moore, I too have had the same issue recently. A property next to my house was on the Land Bank and I was interested in purchasing. When I tried to contact Reggie, I got back emails that had nothing to do with what I asked about. Actually my latest response from him was on this past Friday. I had asked about how to buy the property and if it was still available. His response to me was to contact the mayor's office to get the schedule of his appearances. (???) Hopefully the city is able to do something to fix what this guy has done, it would be nice if they would take the properties back and sell them properly so land owners like me and you mother would have a fair chance.

  3. I too work in the industry, with over 25 years of experience and your political spin has probably nothing to do with any rebranding. "Let's dress it up" would have nothing to do with the government "telling us how and what to eat." Give it a political rest. And being a producer for a radio show doesn't mean you've been involved in advertising and branding for 30 years.

  4. Ms. Morris did not understand the ways of the business world, otherwise, like the IMS, she could have petitioned the State Legislature for a handout of State Funds for her charity work. Ms. Morris should consider becoming a state lobbyist for Lemonade Stand Operators.

  5. David Copperfield!

ADVERTISEMENT