IURC to re-examine Duke project amid ethics flap

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission said it will review four years of cases regarding Duke Energy Corp.’s expensive Edwardsport coal-gasification plant amid a growing ethics controversy involving the company and state regulators.

The commission has also summoned Jim Rogers, the CEO of North Carolina-based Duke, to justify anew the need for the Edwardsport plant, during a hearing on Nov. 3.

In addition, the State Ethics Commission on Thursday filed formal charges against Scott Storms, the IURC former top attorney, for negotiating a job with Duke even as he participated in decisions regarding Duke and its Edwardsport plant. That behavior violates state conflict-of-interest statutes, the complaint alleges.

The Ethics Commission had initially OK’d attorney Storms’ September switchover to work at Duke.

Storms’ contact with Duke officials emerged in e-mails discovered in a probe by Gov. Mitch Daniels’ office, according to Duke. Daniels fired former IURC Commissioner David Hardy on Oct. 5 over the matter and Duke placed its Indiana CEO on administrative leave.

Now, the IURC has opened up its own investigation into the ethics flap, the commission announced Thursday.

Duke’s Edwardsport plant has been controversial as the costs for building it have climbed to $2.9 billion from initial estimates near $1.5 billion. In July, Storms signed off on Duke’s request to pass those costs on to customers.

The Edwardsport plant is already about 70 percent complete, and Duke recently reached a settlement with consumer groups to cap the plants costs at $2.975 billion. Those costs, when passed on to Duke customers, would raise their bills by about 16 percent between now and 2013.


  • "Flap" devalues the story
    This is a major story that probably costs ratepayers millions and the IBJ uses the shallow, devaluing term "flap" as if it were a non-serious situation.
  • Interesting, but...
    ....didn't I read about all this stuff in the Indy Star?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ