Judge orders Clear Channel to sell key Speedway parcel

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The town of Speedway will pay a bit more than it originally offered to acquire Clear Channel Outdoor Inc.’s interest in a parcel of land the town needs to build a roundabout near the Indianapolis Motor Speedway.

Speedway’s redevelopment commission sued San Antonio-based Clear Channel in February after the company rejected its original offer of $165,000. On April, 24, a Marion Superior Court judge ordered the commission to pay Clear Channel $189,000, based on three appraisers’ estimates.

“It’s much less than what they had requested in their counteroffer,” said Scott Harris, executive director of the commission, who declined to divulge the exact amount of Clear Channel’s offer.

A Clear Channel representative couldn’t be reached for comment.

As part of its 16th Street reconstruction project, Speedway wants to build a roundabout where the street intersects with Georgetown and Crawfordsville roads near the main entrance of the track.

Speedway already has purchased the quarter-acre sliver on which the billboard stands at 16th and Main streets from former owner Carl Culmann. But the town needed to acquire Clear Channel’s “leasehold interest” in the parcel and remove the billboard to begin work on the roundabout, according to the lawsuit.

The billboard is behind a vacant house on the parcel of property. Harris said the town plans to tear down the home to build the roundabout. Other road improvements near the intersection include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks, as well as road widenings.

The 16th Street reconstruction project is part of an overall $500 million redevelopment project town leaders hope will transform Speedway into a year-round racing-themed destination.

Speedway officials broke ground in November 2009 on the first phase, which involved $6.7 million in road improvements to Main Street, laying the foundation for redevelopment.

The ambitious project includes more than 350 acres from Main Street to Holt Road and from 16th to 10th streets, just south of IMS.

In all, 2.5 million square feet of new development could be constructed, which could return a 10-year economic impact of up to $5.2 billion and more than 2,000 jobs, Speedway officials say.

Harris of the commission said the dispute with Clear Channel shouldn’t delay the building of the roundabout because an exact timetable has not been set.  


  • Great
    Yes, the Constitution "legitimizes" theft.
  • This Is The System We Have
    Walt, it is the system set up in the Constitution under the Takings Clause. The government has the power to take private property, so long as it provides just compensation. Going to court is the last resort when the parties cannot agree on a price, then the court looks at evidence presented from various certified appraisers to get a market-value.

    That is the system we have had from the beginning in the U.S.

    Look around, the highway system, many public streets, sidewalks, parks, etc. Much of it has been constructed through eminent domain.

    That is how it works.
  • Really?
    Walt, it's fundamental civics:

    The original intent of the US Constitution's framers is really clear on this point. Under the Fifth Amendment, the government can take private property for government purposes, such as public roads and sidewalks. The government must do so by "due process" and pay a fair price. In Indiana, this includes multiple appraisals and a right of judicial appeal by the unwilling seller.

    Amazing the things you can learn by reading.
  • I agree with Walt
    No highway should ever be built unless all of the necessary right-of-way can be purchased from willing sellers.
  • Court intervention
    I do not think it is appropriate for the courts to intervene in a buy sell between two parties. If the buyer wants it he
    should pay the price or there should be
    free negotiations. Why should we allow the courts to dictate what we should sell something for?
    • better
      roundabouts are much more efficient and traffic flow appropriate than lights. don't be scared.
    • What?
      Round-a-bouts aren't a fad. They have existed for hundreds of years.......you are clearly the expert though.
    • Roundabout?
      Roundabouts are the latest fad in transportation planning. They stink.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ