IBJNews

Law firm moving to Carmel City Center

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis law firm of Drewry Simmons Vornehm LLP plans to vacate its office at Keystone Crossing and relocate to the new Carmel City Center.

City and firm leaders held a press conference Friday morning to announce that Drewry Simmons will move in January into the Hopper Building, which is part of Carmel’s downtown master plan, at the southwest corner of Range Line Road and City Center Drive.

In addition, Drewry Simmons said it plans to open an office staffed with three to five lawyers in downtown Indianapolis by early next year, as part of the firm’s growth plan.

Drewry Simmons, founded in 1996, has 39 employees, including 24 attorneys, ranking it the 22nd-largest law firm in Indianapolis, according to IBJ statistics.

Founded in 1996, the firm’s major practice area is construction law.

Carmel City Center is a 1 million-square-foot, $300 million mixed-used development that includes residential, retail and office space, as well as The Center for the Performing Arts. It features the 1,600-seat Palladium concert hall and 500-seat Tarkington theater.

“Being a part of such a large-scale development touches on the heart of our focus and business, as well as the urban aspect of the entire development that will place our employees and clients at the heart of Carmel’s government facilities, retail and restaurant establishments, green space, residential developments, offices and world-class performing arts centers,” Managing Partner Michael F. Drewry said in a prepared statement.

The center’s developer, locally based Pedcor Cos., is working on financing for the next three phases of the project, which would add a hotel and more retail, office and residential space.

Drewry Simmons joins The Addendum, a high-end home-accessory and gift shop located in Broad Ripple, which recently announced it will open a second location, in Carmel City Center.

Addendum plans to open in March and will lease 1,200 square feet. With extensions, its lease could run as long as 15 years.

Addendum opened in Carmel in 2004 and moved to Broad Ripple last year while waiting for the City Center project to finish. Owner Shane Hartke said the shop in Broad Ripple has worked out so well that he will keep the location.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Joing Others
    Drewry Simmons Vornehm will be joining Software Engineering Professionals at the City Center. SEP are moving into their marquee building across from the Palladium in Dec of this year.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT