Lawmakers pass bill to expand vote centers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana General Assembly has passed its first bill of the 2011 legislative session: a proposal to allow any Indiana county to use centralized vote centers instead of neighborhood polling precincts.

Lawmakers put the bill on the fast track so that counties that want to can establish vote centers for the May municipal primary elections. The Senate unanimously approved the proposal, and the House on Monday voted 68-28 to send the bill to Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels.

While some House Democrats joined Republicans in supporting the bill, Democratic Minority Leader Patrick Bauer said the lawmakers' first bill of the session should have dealt with more important issues like creating jobs or protecting education funding.

"It's a terrible precedent to establish," said Bauer, D-South Bend. "It says to the people you care more about your re-election than the people suffering in this state."

Bill supporters said just because the bill happened to be passed first doesn't grant it any significance. Rep. Kathy Richardson, R-Noblesville, said lawmakers have plenty of other bills dealing with jobs and other important topics.

"We have a lot of good things we're working on," she said.

Under vote center systems, counties replace neighborhood precincts with more centralized centers at places like fire departments, senior centers, grocery stores or shopping malls. Some caution that voters without transportation might have problems reaching a voting site if they are spread too far apart, but supporters say voters like the convenience of being able to cast a ballot away from their neighborhood sites.

Tippecanoe, Cass and Wayne counties already use vote centers through a pilot project, and have reported savings because they don't have to staff as many polling sites.

That pilot project expired at the end of 2010, so if lawmakers don't approve the bill those counties would have to go back to local precincts. County clerks say that would cost significant cash, as well as headaches for voters who liked the convenience of being able to vote anywhere in the county.

The bill requires a unanimous vote from the county election board to move to a vote center system and to create details of the switch such as voting locations.

Previous efforts to expand vote centers have gained traction in the Statehouse but ended up tangled up in more contentious election issues. This year's bill simply allows for the expansion of vote centers and does not get caught up with other proposals such as voting by mail.

A 2010 report by the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute shows all 92 counties could save money by using vote centers. Estimated savings vary depending on the size of the county and number of voters, but the analysis said counties that could benefit most are those with moderate size, growing populations and many registered voters per precinct.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............